The EU’s democratic deficit in a realist key: multilateral governance, popular sovereignty and critical responsiveness

J.P. Beetz, Enzo Rossi

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper provides a realist analysis of the European Union’s (EU) legitimacy. We propose a modification of Bernard Williams’ theory of legitimacy, which we term critical responsiveness. For Williams, ‘Basic Legitimation Demand + Modernity = Liberalism’. Drawing on that model, we make three claims. (i) The right side of the equation is insufficiently sensitive to popular sovereignty; (ii) The left side of the equation is best thought of as a ‘legitimation story’: a non-moralised normative account of how to shore up belief in legitimacy while steering clear of both raw domination and ideological distortions. (iii) The EU’s current legitimation story draws on a tradition of popular sovereignty that sits badly with the supranational delegation and pooling of sovereign powers. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s legitimation deficit may be best addressed demoicratically, by recovering the value of popular sovereignty at the expense of a degree of state sovereignty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-41
Number of pages20
JournalTransnational Legal Theory
Volume8
Issue number1
Early online date2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

Fingerprint

legitimation
sovereignty
deficit
EU
governance
legitimacy
liberalism
domination
modernity
demand
Values

Keywords

  • Political realism
  • democratic deficit
  • critical responsiveness
  • legitimacy
  • Bernard Williams
  • European Union
  • popular sovereignty

Cite this

@article{022494db19604ca68d3652094fac5adf,
title = "The EU’s democratic deficit in a realist key: multilateral governance, popular sovereignty and critical responsiveness",
abstract = "This paper provides a realist analysis of the European Union’s (EU) legitimacy. We propose a modification of Bernard Williams’ theory of legitimacy, which we term critical responsiveness. For Williams, ‘Basic Legitimation Demand + Modernity = Liberalism’. Drawing on that model, we make three claims. (i) The right side of the equation is insufficiently sensitive to popular sovereignty; (ii) The left side of the equation is best thought of as a ‘legitimation story’: a non-moralised normative account of how to shore up belief in legitimacy while steering clear of both raw domination and ideological distortions. (iii) The EU’s current legitimation story draws on a tradition of popular sovereignty that sits badly with the supranational delegation and pooling of sovereign powers. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s legitimation deficit may be best addressed demoicratically, by recovering the value of popular sovereignty at the expense of a degree of state sovereignty.",
keywords = "Political realism, democratic deficit, critical responsiveness, legitimacy, Bernard Williams, European Union, popular sovereignty",
author = "J.P. Beetz and Enzo Rossi",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/20414005.2017.1307316",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "22--41",
journal = "Transnational Legal Theory",
issn = "2041-4005",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

The EU’s democratic deficit in a realist key : multilateral governance, popular sovereignty and critical responsiveness. / Beetz, J.P.; Rossi, Enzo.

In: Transnational Legal Theory, Vol. 8, No. 1, 04.2017, p. 22-41.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The EU’s democratic deficit in a realist key

T2 - multilateral governance, popular sovereignty and critical responsiveness

AU - Beetz, J.P.

AU - Rossi, Enzo

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - This paper provides a realist analysis of the European Union’s (EU) legitimacy. We propose a modification of Bernard Williams’ theory of legitimacy, which we term critical responsiveness. For Williams, ‘Basic Legitimation Demand + Modernity = Liberalism’. Drawing on that model, we make three claims. (i) The right side of the equation is insufficiently sensitive to popular sovereignty; (ii) The left side of the equation is best thought of as a ‘legitimation story’: a non-moralised normative account of how to shore up belief in legitimacy while steering clear of both raw domination and ideological distortions. (iii) The EU’s current legitimation story draws on a tradition of popular sovereignty that sits badly with the supranational delegation and pooling of sovereign powers. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s legitimation deficit may be best addressed demoicratically, by recovering the value of popular sovereignty at the expense of a degree of state sovereignty.

AB - This paper provides a realist analysis of the European Union’s (EU) legitimacy. We propose a modification of Bernard Williams’ theory of legitimacy, which we term critical responsiveness. For Williams, ‘Basic Legitimation Demand + Modernity = Liberalism’. Drawing on that model, we make three claims. (i) The right side of the equation is insufficiently sensitive to popular sovereignty; (ii) The left side of the equation is best thought of as a ‘legitimation story’: a non-moralised normative account of how to shore up belief in legitimacy while steering clear of both raw domination and ideological distortions. (iii) The EU’s current legitimation story draws on a tradition of popular sovereignty that sits badly with the supranational delegation and pooling of sovereign powers. We conclude by suggesting that the EU’s legitimation deficit may be best addressed demoicratically, by recovering the value of popular sovereignty at the expense of a degree of state sovereignty.

KW - Political realism

KW - democratic deficit

KW - critical responsiveness

KW - legitimacy

KW - Bernard Williams

KW - European Union

KW - popular sovereignty

U2 - 10.1080/20414005.2017.1307316

DO - 10.1080/20414005.2017.1307316

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 22

EP - 41

JO - Transnational Legal Theory

JF - Transnational Legal Theory

SN - 2041-4005

IS - 1

ER -