Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The evaluation of fingermarks given activity level propositions

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Fingermarks are highly relevant in criminal investigations for individualization purposes. In some cases, the question in court changes from ‘Who is the source of the fingermarks?’ to ‘How did the fingermark end up on the surface?’. In this paper, we explore the evaluation of fingermarks given activity level propositions by using Bayesian networks. The variables that provide information on activity level questions for fingermarks are identified and their current state of knowledge with regards to fingermarks is discussed. We identified the variables transfer, persistency, recovery, background fingermarks, location of the fingermarks, direction of the fingermarks, the area of friction ridge skin that left the mark and pressure distortions as variables that may provide information on how a fingermark ended up on a surface. Using three case examples, we show how Bayesian networks can be used for the evaluation of fingermarks given activity level propositions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number109904
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalForensic Science International
Volume302
Early online date30 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2019

Funding

This work was supported by the RAAK-PRO funding of the Foundation Innovation Alliance (SIA – Stichting Innovatie Alliantie), research grant no. 2014-01-124PRO .

FundersFunder number
Foundation Innovation Alliance
Stichting Innovatie Alliantie2014-01-124PRO
Stichting Innovatie Alliantie

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Activity
    • Bayesian network
    • Evidence interpretation
    • Touch traces

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of fingermarks given activity level propositions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this