The evaluation of religious and spirituality-based therapy compared to standard treatment in mental health care: A multi-level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective
Psychotherapies are increasingly incorporating spiritual and religious systems of belief and practice, which aligns with recent developments toward person-centered treatments. The main objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of a religion and spiritually-based (R/S) therapy to non-R/S treatments.

Method
A multi-level meta-analysis was conducted to compare randomized controlled studies of the efficacy between R/S-based and regular treatments in mental health care setting. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis, psychotherapeutic treatment, and explicitly religion/spirituality therapy. Outcome was assessed for symptoms and for functioning separately, and combined. We also examined several moderators, such as type of comparison, outcome domain, and diagnosis.

Results
Overall effect sizes obtained from 23 studies and 27 comparison groups indicated that a R/S treatment is moderately more efficacious compared to regular treatments at posttreatment (g = .52, p < .01) and at follow-up (g = .72, p < .01) (only available for symptoms). Results were similar for symptoms (g = .44, p < .01) and functioning (g = .62, p < .01).

Conclusion
In patients with a strong religious and spiritual affiliation, treatments with a focus on religious and spiritual issues are more efficacious than non-R/S-based therapy. Limitations as well as future directions are discussed.