The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers

H.F. van der Molen, S. Visser, P.P.F.M. Kuijer, G.S. Faber, M.J.M. Hoozemans, J.H. van Dieen, M.H.W. Frings-Dresen

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Lifting and carrying heavy loads occur frequently among ironworkers and result in high prevalence and incidence rates of low back complaints, injuries and work-disability. From a health perspective, little information is available on the effect of team lifting on work demands and workload. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of team lifting of maximally 50 kg by two ironworkers (T50) with team lifting of maximally 100 kg by four ironworkers (T100). This study combined a field and laboratory study with the following outcome measures: duration and frequency of tasks and activities, energetic workload, perceived discomfort and maximal compression forces (Fc peak) on the low back. The physical work demands and workload of an individual iron worker during manual handling of rebar materials of 100 kg with four workers did not differ from the manual handling of rebar materials of 50 kg with two workers, with the exception of low back discomfort and Fc peak. The biomechanical workload of the low back exceeded for both T50 and T100 the NIOSH threshold limit of 3400N. Therefore, mechanical transport or other effective design solutions should be considered to reduce the biomechanical workload of the low back and the accompanying health risks among iron workers. © 2012 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)3771-3773
    JournalWork: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation
    Volume41
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    Workload
    Iron
    Back Injuries
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
    Health
    Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
    Incidence

    Cite this

    van der Molen, H.F. ; Visser, S. ; Kuijer, P.P.F.M. ; Faber, G.S. ; Hoozemans, M.J.M. ; van Dieen, J.H. ; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W. / The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers. In: Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation. 2012 ; Vol. 41. pp. 3771-3773.
    @article{95ca6fdd661a43ceaf787b08d170621f,
    title = "The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers",
    abstract = "Lifting and carrying heavy loads occur frequently among ironworkers and result in high prevalence and incidence rates of low back complaints, injuries and work-disability. From a health perspective, little information is available on the effect of team lifting on work demands and workload. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of team lifting of maximally 50 kg by two ironworkers (T50) with team lifting of maximally 100 kg by four ironworkers (T100). This study combined a field and laboratory study with the following outcome measures: duration and frequency of tasks and activities, energetic workload, perceived discomfort and maximal compression forces (Fc peak) on the low back. The physical work demands and workload of an individual iron worker during manual handling of rebar materials of 100 kg with four workers did not differ from the manual handling of rebar materials of 50 kg with two workers, with the exception of low back discomfort and Fc peak. The biomechanical workload of the low back exceeded for both T50 and T100 the NIOSH threshold limit of 3400N. Therefore, mechanical transport or other effective design solutions should be considered to reduce the biomechanical workload of the low back and the accompanying health risks among iron workers. {\circledC} 2012 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.",
    author = "{van der Molen}, H.F. and S. Visser and P.P.F.M. Kuijer and G.S. Faber and M.J.M. Hoozemans and {van Dieen}, J.H. and M.H.W. Frings-Dresen",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.3233/WOR-2012-0003-3771",
    language = "English",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "3771--3773",
    journal = "Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation",
    issn = "1051-9815",
    publisher = "IOS Press",

    }

    The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers. / van der Molen, H.F.; Visser, S.; Kuijer, P.P.F.M.; Faber, G.S.; Hoozemans, M.J.M.; van Dieen, J.H.; Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.

    In: Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation, Vol. 41, 2012, p. 3771-3773.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The evaluation of team lifting on physical work demands and workload in ironworkers

    AU - van der Molen, H.F.

    AU - Visser, S.

    AU - Kuijer, P.P.F.M.

    AU - Faber, G.S.

    AU - Hoozemans, M.J.M.

    AU - van Dieen, J.H.

    AU - Frings-Dresen, M.H.W.

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Lifting and carrying heavy loads occur frequently among ironworkers and result in high prevalence and incidence rates of low back complaints, injuries and work-disability. From a health perspective, little information is available on the effect of team lifting on work demands and workload. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of team lifting of maximally 50 kg by two ironworkers (T50) with team lifting of maximally 100 kg by four ironworkers (T100). This study combined a field and laboratory study with the following outcome measures: duration and frequency of tasks and activities, energetic workload, perceived discomfort and maximal compression forces (Fc peak) on the low back. The physical work demands and workload of an individual iron worker during manual handling of rebar materials of 100 kg with four workers did not differ from the manual handling of rebar materials of 50 kg with two workers, with the exception of low back discomfort and Fc peak. The biomechanical workload of the low back exceeded for both T50 and T100 the NIOSH threshold limit of 3400N. Therefore, mechanical transport or other effective design solutions should be considered to reduce the biomechanical workload of the low back and the accompanying health risks among iron workers. © 2012 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

    AB - Lifting and carrying heavy loads occur frequently among ironworkers and result in high prevalence and incidence rates of low back complaints, injuries and work-disability. From a health perspective, little information is available on the effect of team lifting on work demands and workload. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of team lifting of maximally 50 kg by two ironworkers (T50) with team lifting of maximally 100 kg by four ironworkers (T100). This study combined a field and laboratory study with the following outcome measures: duration and frequency of tasks and activities, energetic workload, perceived discomfort and maximal compression forces (Fc peak) on the low back. The physical work demands and workload of an individual iron worker during manual handling of rebar materials of 100 kg with four workers did not differ from the manual handling of rebar materials of 50 kg with two workers, with the exception of low back discomfort and Fc peak. The biomechanical workload of the low back exceeded for both T50 and T100 the NIOSH threshold limit of 3400N. Therefore, mechanical transport or other effective design solutions should be considered to reduce the biomechanical workload of the low back and the accompanying health risks among iron workers. © 2012 - IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.3233/WOR-2012-0003-3771

    DO - 10.3233/WOR-2012-0003-3771

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 3771

    EP - 3773

    JO - Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation

    JF - Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation

    SN - 1051-9815

    ER -