TY - JOUR
T1 - The Experience of Legal Injustice
AU - Veraart, W.J.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This paper compares the legal thought of Lon Fuller and Hannah Arendt on the point of legal injustice. It argues, in reply to a paper by Kristen Rundle, that what Fuller and Arendt share is not so much an interest in the experience of law-as-such (the interaction between responsible agency and law as a complex institution), but rather an interest in the junction of law and injustice. However, there is an important point of divergence between Arendt and Fuller. In particular, Arendt differs from Fuller in her conviction that ‘injustice in a legal form’ is an integral part of modern legal systems.
AB - This paper compares the legal thought of Lon Fuller and Hannah Arendt on the point of legal injustice. It argues, in reply to a paper by Kristen Rundle, that what Fuller and Arendt share is not so much an interest in the experience of law-as-such (the interaction between responsible agency and law as a complex institution), but rather an interest in the junction of law and injustice. However, there is an important point of divergence between Arendt and Fuller. In particular, Arendt differs from Fuller in her conviction that ‘injustice in a legal form’ is an integral part of modern legal systems.
U2 - 10.5553/njlp/.000022
DO - 10.5553/njlp/.000022
M3 - Article
SN - 2213-0713
VL - 43
SP - 267
EP - 278
JO - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy
JF - Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy
IS - 3
ER -