The Formula of Universal Law: A Reconstruction

M. Braham, Martin van Hees

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper provides a methodologically original construction of Kant’s “Formula of Universal Law” (FUL). A formal structure consisting of possible worlds and games—a “game frame”—is used to implement Kant’s concept of a maxim and to define the two tests FUL comprises: the “contradiction in conception” and “contradiction in the will” tests. The paper makes two contributions. Firstly, the model provides a formal account of the variables that are built into FUL: agents, maxims, intentions, actions, and outcomes. This establishes a clear benchmark for understanding how the mechanics of FUL actually work. Secondly, the analysis of the resulting framework sheds new light on discussions about the implications of FUL. On the basis of this, we suggest a move to “comprehensive Kantianism’, which is the application of FUL to systems of maxims rather than to isolated maxims.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)243-260
JournalErkenntnis
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Mechanics
Game
Benchmark
Model
Framework
Concepts
Kantianism
Possible Worlds
Conception
Intentions

Cite this

@article{6db81712915447c48c37607e4f4f277f,
title = "The Formula of Universal Law: A Reconstruction",
abstract = "This paper provides a methodologically original construction of Kant’s “Formula of Universal Law” (FUL). A formal structure consisting of possible worlds and games—a “game frame”—is used to implement Kant’s concept of a maxim and to define the two tests FUL comprises: the “contradiction in conception” and “contradiction in the will” tests. The paper makes two contributions. Firstly, the model provides a formal account of the variables that are built into FUL: agents, maxims, intentions, actions, and outcomes. This establishes a clear benchmark for understanding how the mechanics of FUL actually work. Secondly, the analysis of the resulting framework sheds new light on discussions about the implications of FUL. On the basis of this, we suggest a move to “comprehensive Kantianism’, which is the application of FUL to systems of maxims rather than to isolated maxims.",
author = "M. Braham and {van Hees}, Martin",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s10670-014-9624-y",
language = "English",
pages = "243--260",
journal = "Erkenntnis",
issn = "0165-0106",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

The Formula of Universal Law: A Reconstruction. / Braham, M.; van Hees, Martin.

In: Erkenntnis, 2015, p. 243-260.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Formula of Universal Law: A Reconstruction

AU - Braham, M.

AU - van Hees, Martin

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper provides a methodologically original construction of Kant’s “Formula of Universal Law” (FUL). A formal structure consisting of possible worlds and games—a “game frame”—is used to implement Kant’s concept of a maxim and to define the two tests FUL comprises: the “contradiction in conception” and “contradiction in the will” tests. The paper makes two contributions. Firstly, the model provides a formal account of the variables that are built into FUL: agents, maxims, intentions, actions, and outcomes. This establishes a clear benchmark for understanding how the mechanics of FUL actually work. Secondly, the analysis of the resulting framework sheds new light on discussions about the implications of FUL. On the basis of this, we suggest a move to “comprehensive Kantianism’, which is the application of FUL to systems of maxims rather than to isolated maxims.

AB - This paper provides a methodologically original construction of Kant’s “Formula of Universal Law” (FUL). A formal structure consisting of possible worlds and games—a “game frame”—is used to implement Kant’s concept of a maxim and to define the two tests FUL comprises: the “contradiction in conception” and “contradiction in the will” tests. The paper makes two contributions. Firstly, the model provides a formal account of the variables that are built into FUL: agents, maxims, intentions, actions, and outcomes. This establishes a clear benchmark for understanding how the mechanics of FUL actually work. Secondly, the analysis of the resulting framework sheds new light on discussions about the implications of FUL. On the basis of this, we suggest a move to “comprehensive Kantianism’, which is the application of FUL to systems of maxims rather than to isolated maxims.

U2 - 10.1007/s10670-014-9624-y

DO - 10.1007/s10670-014-9624-y

M3 - Article

SP - 243

EP - 260

JO - Erkenntnis

JF - Erkenntnis

SN - 0165-0106

ER -