Research output per year
Research output per year
Marieke De Hoon*
Research output: Contribution to Journal › Review article › Academic › peer-review
While the International Criminal Court (icc) strives for justice for atrocity crimes throughout the world, increasingly, its legitimacy is undermined: powerful states refuse to join, African states prepare to leave, victims do not feel their needs for justice are met. This article argues that this is due to contradicting assumptions and too many objectives attached to the expectations of international criminal justice, which pull and push what the criminal trial is supposed to do in too many directions, undermining what it can do, raising too high expectations, and leading to disappointment. The article analyses the critique as rooted in a misunderstanding of what 'justice' is, what a criminal trial can do, and how inherently political international criminal justice is and only can be. It concludes with some observations on what this entails for strengthening the legitimacy of the icc by matching expectations to what it can and cannot do.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 591-614 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | International Criminal Law Review |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 29 Jun 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2017 |
Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceeding › Chapter › Academic › peer-review