The Future of the International Criminal Court. On Critique, Legalism and Strengthening the ICC's Legitimacy

Marieke De Hoon*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

While the International Criminal Court (icc) strives for justice for atrocity crimes throughout the world, increasingly, its legitimacy is undermined: powerful states refuse to join, African states prepare to leave, victims do not feel their needs for justice are met. This article argues that this is due to contradicting assumptions and too many objectives attached to the expectations of international criminal justice, which pull and push what the criminal trial is supposed to do in too many directions, undermining what it can do, raising too high expectations, and leading to disappointment. The article analyses the critique as rooted in a misunderstanding of what 'justice' is, what a criminal trial can do, and how inherently political international criminal justice is and only can be. It concludes with some observations on what this entails for strengthening the legitimacy of the icc by matching expectations to what it can and cannot do.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-614
Number of pages24
JournalInternational Criminal Law Review
Volume17
Issue number4
Early online date29 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Keywords

  • Africa
  • critique
  • International Criminal Court (icc)
  • international criminal justice
  • international criminal law
  • law and politics
  • legitimacy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Future of the International Criminal Court. On Critique, Legalism and Strengthening the ICC's Legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this