The future we get might not be the future we want: Analyzing the Rio+20 outcomes

P.H. Pattberg, A. Mert

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The Rio+20 Summit resulted in a policy outcome that, according to most observers, did not meet the requirements for a deep transformation of the current unsustainable practices that contribute to global environmental change. In light of this assessment, scholars and practitioners have questioned the effectiveness of intergovernmental conferences to solve environmental problems and suggested alternatives, including voluntary commitments, public-private partnerships and bottom-up approaches. This survey article analyzes the Rio+20 outcomes and argues that, while the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. In this context, this article also urges leaders not to abandon international agreements for governing global change prematurely. While the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met by the Rio+20 outcomes, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. © 2013 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LanguageEnglish
Pages305-310
JournalGlobal Policy
Volume4
Issue number3
Early online date25 Sep 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

nongovernmental organization
non-governmental organization
seed
bottom-up approach
international agreement
public-private partnership
global change
public private partnership
environmental impact
environmental change
commitment
leader
public
Non-governmental organizations
policy
Bottom-up
Global change
Public-private partnerships
International agreements
Observer

Cite this

@article{5aade17aede440b5a83063b83b5ffb65,
title = "The future we get might not be the future we want: Analyzing the Rio+20 outcomes",
abstract = "The Rio+20 Summit resulted in a policy outcome that, according to most observers, did not meet the requirements for a deep transformation of the current unsustainable practices that contribute to global environmental change. In light of this assessment, scholars and practitioners have questioned the effectiveness of intergovernmental conferences to solve environmental problems and suggested alternatives, including voluntary commitments, public-private partnerships and bottom-up approaches. This survey article analyzes the Rio+20 outcomes and argues that, while the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. In this context, this article also urges leaders not to abandon international agreements for governing global change prematurely. While the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met by the Rio+20 outcomes, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. {\circledC} 2013 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
author = "P.H. Pattberg and A. Mert",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1111/1758-5899.12044",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "305--310",
journal = "Global Policy",
issn = "1758-5880",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "3",

}

The future we get might not be the future we want: Analyzing the Rio+20 outcomes. / Pattberg, P.H.; Mert, A.

In: Global Policy, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2013, p. 305-310.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The future we get might not be the future we want: Analyzing the Rio+20 outcomes

AU - Pattberg, P.H.

AU - Mert, A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The Rio+20 Summit resulted in a policy outcome that, according to most observers, did not meet the requirements for a deep transformation of the current unsustainable practices that contribute to global environmental change. In light of this assessment, scholars and practitioners have questioned the effectiveness of intergovernmental conferences to solve environmental problems and suggested alternatives, including voluntary commitments, public-private partnerships and bottom-up approaches. This survey article analyzes the Rio+20 outcomes and argues that, while the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. In this context, this article also urges leaders not to abandon international agreements for governing global change prematurely. While the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met by the Rio+20 outcomes, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. © 2013 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - The Rio+20 Summit resulted in a policy outcome that, according to most observers, did not meet the requirements for a deep transformation of the current unsustainable practices that contribute to global environmental change. In light of this assessment, scholars and practitioners have questioned the effectiveness of intergovernmental conferences to solve environmental problems and suggested alternatives, including voluntary commitments, public-private partnerships and bottom-up approaches. This survey article analyzes the Rio+20 outcomes and argues that, while the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. In this context, this article also urges leaders not to abandon international agreements for governing global change prematurely. While the overtly high expectations of the public, media, NGOs and scientists have not been met by the Rio+20 outcomes, the concrete results might include the seeds for a substantive transformation of current unsustainable practices. © 2013 University of Durham and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1111/1758-5899.12044

DO - 10.1111/1758-5899.12044

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 305

EP - 310

JO - Global Policy

T2 - Global Policy

JF - Global Policy

SN - 1758-5880

IS - 3

ER -