Abstract
The equal-risk-contribution, inverse-volatility weighted, maximum-diversification and minimum-variance portfolio weights are all direct functions of the estimated covariance matrix. We perform a Monte Carlo study to assess the impact of covariance matrix misspecification to these risk-based portfolios at the daily, weekly and monthly forecasting horizon. Our results show that the equal-risk-contribution and inverse-volatility weighted portfolio weights are relatively robust to covariance misspecification. In contrast, the minimum-variance portfolio weights are highly sensitive to errors in both the estimated variances and correlations, while errors in the estimated correlations can have a large effect on the weights of the maximum-diversification portfolio.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-16 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Annals of Operations Research |
| Volume | 254 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Early online date | 22 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2017 |
Keywords
- Covariance misspecification
- Monte Carlo study
- Risk-based portfolios
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of covariance misspecification in risk-based portfolios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver