The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Valerio Capraro*, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean François Bonnefon, Pablo Brañas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A.C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Werner H. Kunz, Chiara Longoni, Pete LunnSimone Natale, Stefanie Paluch, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander Van Der Linden, Paul A.M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section, we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalPNAS Nexus
Volume3
Issue number6
Early online date11 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation
Google
Università degli Studi di Torino
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Center for Conflict and Cooperation, Templeton World Charity Foundation
Schmidt Sciences
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
MIT Sloan School
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Smith Richardson Foundation
Templeton World Charity FoundationTWCF-2022-30561, 4666103
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Human-Machine Communication Cultures: Artificial Intelligence, Media and CulturesNATS_GFI_22_01_F.
Ministerio de Ciencia e InnovaciónPID2021-126892NB-I00
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
European Research Council101018262
European Research Council
Leverhulme TrustPLP-2021-095
Leverhulme Trust
Washington Center for Equitable GrowthANR-19-PI3A-0004, ANR-17-EURE-0010
Washington Center for Equitable Growth
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/V015176/1
Economic and Social Research Council
Australian Research CouncilFL180100094
Australian Research Council

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this