The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making

Valerio Capraro*, Austin Lentsch, Daron Acemoglu, Selin Akgun, Aisel Akhmedova, Ennio Bilancini, Jean François Bonnefon, Pablo Brañas-Garza, Luigi Butera, Karen M. Douglas, Jim A.C. Everett, Gerd Gigerenzer, Christine Greenhow, Daniel A. Hashimoto, Julianne Holt-Lunstad, Jolanda Jetten, Simon Johnson, Werner H. Kunz, Chiara Longoni, Pete LunnSimone Natale, Stefanie Paluch, Iyad Rahwan, Neil Selwyn, Vivek Singh, Siddharth Suri, Jennifer Sutcliffe, Joe Tomlinson, Sander Van Der Linden, Paul A.M. Van Lange, Friederike Wall, Jay J. Van Bavel, Riccardo Viale

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to both exacerbate and ameliorate existing socioeconomic inequalities. In this article, we provide a state-of-the-art interdisciplinary overview of the potential impacts of generative AI on (mis)information and three information-intensive domains: work, education, and healthcare. Our goal is to highlight how generative AI could worsen existing inequalities while illuminating how AI may help mitigate pervasive social problems. In the information domain, generative AI can democratize content creation and access but may dramatically expand the production and proliferation of misinformation. In the workplace, it can boost productivity and create new jobs, but the benefits will likely be distributed unevenly. In education, it offers personalized learning, but may widen the digital divide. In healthcare, it might improve diagnostics and accessibility, but could deepen pre-existing inequalities. In each section, we cover a specific topic, evaluate existing research, identify critical gaps, and recommend research directions, including explicit trade-offs that complicate the derivation of a priori hypotheses. We conclude with a section highlighting the role of policymaking to maximize generative AI's potential to reduce inequalities while mitigating its harmful effects. We discuss strengths and weaknesses of existing policy frameworks in the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom, observing that each fails to fully confront the socioeconomic challenges we have identified. We propose several concrete policies that could promote shared prosperity through the advancement of generative AI. This article emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary collaborations to understand and address the complex challenges of generative AI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalPNAS Nexus
Volume3
Issue number6
Early online date11 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).

Funding

D.A. acknowledges support from the Hewlett Foundation, the US National Science Foundation, Schmidt Sciences, Google, the Sloan Foundation, the Smith Richardson Foundation, and the Washington Center for Equitable Growth. J.F.B. acknowledges support from grant ANR-19-PI3A-0004, grant ANR-17-EURE-0010, and the research foundation TSE-Partnership. P.B.G. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2021-126892NB-I00). K.D. acknowledges support from the ERC Advanced Grant \"Consequences of conspiracy theories- CONSPIRACY-FX\" Number: 101018262. J.A.C.E. acknowledges support by the ESRC (ES/V015176/1) and Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2021-095). J.J. acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (FL180100094). S.J. acknowledges support from the Hewlett Foundation and the MIT Sloan School, MIT. S.N. acknowledges support from the University of Turin, Italy, Grant \"Human-Machine Communication Cultures: Artificial Intelligence, Media and Cultures in a Global Context\", reference number NATS-GFI-22-01-F. P.V.L. acknowledges support from an Ammodo science award (2020) provided by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. J.V.B. acknowledges support from the Trust in generative AI, Google Jigsaw, and from the Center for Conflict and Cooperation, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF-2022-30561). This manuscript was posted on a preprint server: https://papers.ssrn. com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract-id=4666103. D.A. acknowledges support from the Hewlett Foundation, the US National Science Foundation, Schmidt Sciences, Google, the Sloan Foundation, the Smith Richardson Foundation, and the Washington Center for Equitable Growth. J.F.B. acknowledges support from grant ANR-19-PI3A-0004, grant ANR-17-EURE-0010, and the research foundation TSE-Partnership. P.B.G. acknowledges support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (PID2021-126892NB-I00). K.D. acknowledges support from the ERC Advanced Grant \u201CConsequences of conspiracy theories\u2014CONSPIRACY_FX\u201D Number: 101018262. J.A.C.E. acknowledges support by the ESRC (ES/V015176/1) and Leverhulme Trust (PLP-2021-095). J.J. acknowledges support from the Australian Research Council Laureate Fellowship (FL180100094). S.J. acknowledges support from the Hewlett Foundation and the MIT Sloan School, MIT. S.N. acknowledges support from the University of Turin, Italy, Grant \u201CHuman-Machine Communication Cultures: Artificial Intelligence, Media and Cultures in a Global Context\u201D, reference number NATS_GFI_22_01_F. P.V.L. acknowledges support from an Ammodo science award (2020) provided by the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. J.V.B. acknowledges support from the Trust in generative AI, Google Jigsaw, and from the Center for Conflict and Cooperation, Templeton World Charity Foundation, Templeton World Charity Foundation (TWCF-2022-30561). This manuscript was posted on a preprint server: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4666103

FundersFunder number
National Science Foundation
Google
Università degli Studi di Torino
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
Center for Conflict and Cooperation, Templeton World Charity Foundation
Schmidt Sciences
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
MIT Sloan School
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
European Research Council
Smith Richardson Foundation
Templeton World Charity FoundationTWCF-2022-30561, 4666103
Human-Machine Communication Cultures: Artificial Intelligence, Media and CulturesNATS_GFI_22_01_F.
Ministerio de Ciencia e InnovaciónPID2021-126892NB-I00
Leverhulme TrustPLP-2021-095
Washington Center for Equitable GrowthANR-19-PI3A-0004, ANR-17-EURE-0010
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme101018262
Economic and Social Research CouncilES/V015176/1
Australian Research CouncilFL180100094

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this