TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of restorative material and ceramic thickness on CAD\CAM endocrowns
AU - Tribst, João Paulo Mendes
AU - de Oliveira Dal Piva, Amanda Maria
AU - Madruga, Camila Ferreira Leite
AU - Valera, Marcia Carneiro
AU - Bresciani, Eduardo
AU - Bottino, Marco Antonio
AU - de Melo, Renata Marques
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Endocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need an in vitro investigation under fatigue at different materials. This study evaluated the effect of restorative material and restoration thickness on the maximum fracture load of endocrowns subjected to cyclic loading. Material and Methods: Sixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results: All endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration's fracture load (p=0.548) instead the restorative material (p=0.003). LD showed higher mean values (1714.43 N)A than LEU (1313.47 N)B. Conclusions: Endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material's minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected.
AB - Background: Endocrown restorations as a conservative approach to restore endodontically treated teeth still need an in vitro investigation under fatigue at different materials. This study evaluated the effect of restorative material and restoration thickness on the maximum fracture load of endocrowns subjected to cyclic loading. Material and Methods: Sixty (60) third molar teeth received an endocrown preparation with three different heights of remaining dental tissue (1.5, 3.0 or 4.5 mm). A leucite-based ceramic (LEU) and a lithium disilicate (LD) based ceramic were selected to manufacture the CAD/CAM endocrown restorations, totaling 6 groups (n=10). The specimens were subjected to fatigue loading (200N, 2 x 106 cycles, water) and then to the single load to failure test (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Data were analyzed by using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results: All endocrowns survived the fatigue test. The thickness did not influence the restoration's fracture load (p=0.548) instead the restorative material (p=0.003). LD showed higher mean values (1714.43 N)A than LEU (1313.47 N)B. Conclusions: Endocrowns manufactured with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate blocks showed superior fracture load than the leucite-based blocks after mechanical fatigue. Nevertheless, both materials presented acceptable survival and fracture load as long as the material's minimum thickness and the enamel adhesion are respected.
KW - CAD/CAM
KW - Endocrown
KW - Endodontically treated teeth
KW - Failure load
KW - Minimal intervention dentistry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083522349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083522349&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4317/JCED.56002
DO - 10.4317/JCED.56002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083522349
SN - 1989-5488
VL - 11
SP - 969
EP - 977
JO - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
JF - Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
IS - 12
ER -