The impact of the bird flu on public willingness to pay for the protection of migratory birds

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this paper, we present the results of a unique time series analysis of contingent values and models for migratory bird protection based on an identical contingent valuation (CV) survey carried out over a three year time period since the first bird flu outbreak in 2003. Although there exists no scientific evidence for a direct relationship, migratory birds are believed to play an important role in spreading the bird flu virus worldwide. The time series analysis allows us to test the temporal stability of stated preferences for migratory bird protection and at the same time examine indirectly the possible impact of increased media attention and public awareness levels regarding the bird flu. We test the impact of the bird flu on public willingness to pay (WTP) for migratory bird protection in the final 2005 survey whilst accounting for procedural variance introduced by sequencing and question ordering-effects, but we are unable to demonstrate a direct negative relationship. A novelty of the study presented here is that respondents in the CV surveys are given the opportunity to pay an annual money amount or a one-time-off lump-sum. Annual WTP values appear to be significantly higher than one-time-off WTP values, suggesting a negative implicit discount rate. Self-selection bias is an important reason for the observed differences. We find that respondents who agree to pay annually differ significantly from respondents who wish to pay a lump-sum in terms of their underlying preferences and motivations towards migratory bird protection. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)575-585
JournalEcological Economics
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of the bird flu on public willingness to pay for the protection of migratory birds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this