The influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules spent and various training loads in professional cycling

Teun van Erp, Marco Hoozemans, Carl Foster, Jos J. de Koning

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: A valid measure for training load (TL) is an important tool for cyclists, trainers, and sport scientists involved in professional cycling. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules (kJ) spent and different measures of TL to arrive at valid measures of TL. Methods: Four years of field data were collected from 21 cyclists of a professional cycling team, including 11,716 training and race sessions. kJ spent was obtained from power output measurements, and others TLs were calculated based on the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), heart rate (Lucia training impulse [luTRIMP]), and power output (training stress score [TSS]). Exercise intensity was expressed by the intensity factor (IF). To study the effect of exercise intensity on the association between kJ spent and various other TLs (sRPE, luTRIMP, and TSS), data from low- and high-intensity sessions were subjected to regression analyses using generalized estimating equations. Results: This study shows that the IF is significantly different for training and race sessions (0.59 [0.03] vs 0.73 [0.03]). Significant regression coefficients show that kJ spent is a good predictor of sRPE, and luTRIMP, as well as TSS. However, IF does not influence the associations between kJ spent and sRPE and luTRIMP, while the association with TSS is different when sessions are done with low or high IF. Conclusion: It seems that the TSS reacts differently to exercise intensity than sRPE and luTRIMP. A possible explanation could be the quadratic relation between IF and TSS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1395-1400
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
Volume14
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Exercise
Sports
Heart Rate
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • High performance
  • LuTRIMP
  • RPE
  • SRPE
  • Training monitoring
  • TSS

Cite this

@article{f31ad6958e0f4495b80df327839209c1,
title = "The influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules spent and various training loads in professional cycling",
abstract = "Purpose: A valid measure for training load (TL) is an important tool for cyclists, trainers, and sport scientists involved in professional cycling. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules (kJ) spent and different measures of TL to arrive at valid measures of TL. Methods: Four years of field data were collected from 21 cyclists of a professional cycling team, including 11,716 training and race sessions. kJ spent was obtained from power output measurements, and others TLs were calculated based on the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), heart rate (Lucia training impulse [luTRIMP]), and power output (training stress score [TSS]). Exercise intensity was expressed by the intensity factor (IF). To study the effect of exercise intensity on the association between kJ spent and various other TLs (sRPE, luTRIMP, and TSS), data from low- and high-intensity sessions were subjected to regression analyses using generalized estimating equations. Results: This study shows that the IF is significantly different for training and race sessions (0.59 [0.03] vs 0.73 [0.03]). Significant regression coefficients show that kJ spent is a good predictor of sRPE, and luTRIMP, as well as TSS. However, IF does not influence the associations between kJ spent and sRPE and luTRIMP, while the association with TSS is different when sessions are done with low or high IF. Conclusion: It seems that the TSS reacts differently to exercise intensity than sRPE and luTRIMP. A possible explanation could be the quadratic relation between IF and TSS.",
keywords = "High performance, LuTRIMP, RPE, SRPE, Training monitoring, TSS",
author = "{van Erp}, Teun and Marco Hoozemans and Carl Foster and {de Koning}, {Jos J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1123/ijspp.2018-0877",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1395--1400",
journal = "International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance",
issn = "1555-0265",
publisher = "Human Kinetics Publishers Inc.",
number = "10",

}

The influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules spent and various training loads in professional cycling. / van Erp, Teun; Hoozemans, Marco; Foster, Carl; de Koning, Jos J.

In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, Vol. 14, No. 10, 01.01.2019, p. 1395-1400.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules spent and various training loads in professional cycling

AU - van Erp, Teun

AU - Hoozemans, Marco

AU - Foster, Carl

AU - de Koning, Jos J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: A valid measure for training load (TL) is an important tool for cyclists, trainers, and sport scientists involved in professional cycling. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules (kJ) spent and different measures of TL to arrive at valid measures of TL. Methods: Four years of field data were collected from 21 cyclists of a professional cycling team, including 11,716 training and race sessions. kJ spent was obtained from power output measurements, and others TLs were calculated based on the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), heart rate (Lucia training impulse [luTRIMP]), and power output (training stress score [TSS]). Exercise intensity was expressed by the intensity factor (IF). To study the effect of exercise intensity on the association between kJ spent and various other TLs (sRPE, luTRIMP, and TSS), data from low- and high-intensity sessions were subjected to regression analyses using generalized estimating equations. Results: This study shows that the IF is significantly different for training and race sessions (0.59 [0.03] vs 0.73 [0.03]). Significant regression coefficients show that kJ spent is a good predictor of sRPE, and luTRIMP, as well as TSS. However, IF does not influence the associations between kJ spent and sRPE and luTRIMP, while the association with TSS is different when sessions are done with low or high IF. Conclusion: It seems that the TSS reacts differently to exercise intensity than sRPE and luTRIMP. A possible explanation could be the quadratic relation between IF and TSS.

AB - Purpose: A valid measure for training load (TL) is an important tool for cyclists, trainers, and sport scientists involved in professional cycling. The aim of this study was to explore the influence of exercise intensity on the association between kilojoules (kJ) spent and different measures of TL to arrive at valid measures of TL. Methods: Four years of field data were collected from 21 cyclists of a professional cycling team, including 11,716 training and race sessions. kJ spent was obtained from power output measurements, and others TLs were calculated based on the session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE), heart rate (Lucia training impulse [luTRIMP]), and power output (training stress score [TSS]). Exercise intensity was expressed by the intensity factor (IF). To study the effect of exercise intensity on the association between kJ spent and various other TLs (sRPE, luTRIMP, and TSS), data from low- and high-intensity sessions were subjected to regression analyses using generalized estimating equations. Results: This study shows that the IF is significantly different for training and race sessions (0.59 [0.03] vs 0.73 [0.03]). Significant regression coefficients show that kJ spent is a good predictor of sRPE, and luTRIMP, as well as TSS. However, IF does not influence the associations between kJ spent and sRPE and luTRIMP, while the association with TSS is different when sessions are done with low or high IF. Conclusion: It seems that the TSS reacts differently to exercise intensity than sRPE and luTRIMP. A possible explanation could be the quadratic relation between IF and TSS.

KW - High performance

KW - LuTRIMP

KW - RPE

KW - SRPE

KW - Training monitoring

KW - TSS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076336064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076336064&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0877

DO - 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0877

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 1395

EP - 1400

JO - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

JF - International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

SN - 1555-0265

IS - 10

ER -