The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

Koen I. Neijenhuijs, Karen Holtmaat, Neil K. Aaronson, Bernhard Holzner, Caroline B. Terwee, Pim Cuijpers, Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in men. Aim: To perform a systematic review of the measurement properties of the 15-item patient-reported outcome measure (IIEF-15) and the shortened 5-item version (IIEF-5). Methods: A systematic search of scientific literature up to April 2018 was performed. Data were extracted and analyzed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence of measurement properties was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence as very high, high, moderate, or low. Results: 40 studies were included. The evidence for criterion validity (of the Erectile Function subscale), and responsiveness of the IIEF-15 was sufficient (high quality), but inconsistent (moderate quality) for structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability. Evidence for structural validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the IIEF-5 was sufficient (moderate quality) but indeterminate for internal consistency, measurement error, and responsiveness. Clinical Implications: Lack of evidence for and evidence not supporting some of the measurement properties of the IIEF-15 and IIEF-5 shows the importance of further research on the validity of these questionnaires in clinical research and clinical practice. Strengths & Limitations: A strength of the current review is the use of predefined guidelines (COSMIN). A limitation of this review is the use of a precise rather than a sensitive search filter regarding measurement properties to identify studies to be included. Conclusion: The IIEF requires more research on structural validity (IIEF-15), internal consistency (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), construct validity (IIEF-15), measurement error (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), and responsiveness (IIEF-5). The most pressing matter for future research is determining the unidimensionality of the IIEF-5 and the exact factor structure of the IIEF-15. Neijenhuijs KI, Holtmaat K, Aaronson NK, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)—A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Sex Med 2019;16:1078–1091.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1078-1091
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Sexual Medicine
Volume16
Issue number7
Early online date27 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Research
Guidelines
Literature
Erectile Dysfunction
Consensus
Health
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • COSMIN
  • International Index of Erectile Function
  • Measurement Properties
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Cite this

@article{542d98d49b854546b22afd6432593f39,
title = "The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties",
abstract = "Introduction: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in men. Aim: To perform a systematic review of the measurement properties of the 15-item patient-reported outcome measure (IIEF-15) and the shortened 5-item version (IIEF-5). Methods: A systematic search of scientific literature up to April 2018 was performed. Data were extracted and analyzed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence of measurement properties was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence as very high, high, moderate, or low. Results: 40 studies were included. The evidence for criterion validity (of the Erectile Function subscale), and responsiveness of the IIEF-15 was sufficient (high quality), but inconsistent (moderate quality) for structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability. Evidence for structural validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the IIEF-5 was sufficient (moderate quality) but indeterminate for internal consistency, measurement error, and responsiveness. Clinical Implications: Lack of evidence for and evidence not supporting some of the measurement properties of the IIEF-15 and IIEF-5 shows the importance of further research on the validity of these questionnaires in clinical research and clinical practice. Strengths & Limitations: A strength of the current review is the use of predefined guidelines (COSMIN). A limitation of this review is the use of a precise rather than a sensitive search filter regarding measurement properties to identify studies to be included. Conclusion: The IIEF requires more research on structural validity (IIEF-15), internal consistency (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), construct validity (IIEF-15), measurement error (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), and responsiveness (IIEF-5). The most pressing matter for future research is determining the unidimensionality of the IIEF-5 and the exact factor structure of the IIEF-15. Neijenhuijs KI, Holtmaat K, Aaronson NK, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)—A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Sex Med 2019;16:1078–1091.",
keywords = "COSMIN, International Index of Erectile Function, Measurement Properties, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Neijenhuijs, {Koen I.} and Karen Holtmaat and Aaronson, {Neil K.} and Bernhard Holzner and Terwee, {Caroline B.} and Pim Cuijpers and {Verdonck-de Leeuw}, {Irma M.}",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.010",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1078--1091",
journal = "Journal of Sexual Medicine",
issn = "1743-6095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. / Neijenhuijs, Koen I.; Holtmaat, Karen; Aaronson, Neil K.; Holzner, Bernhard; Terwee, Caroline B.; Cuijpers, Pim; Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.

In: Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 1078-1091.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties

AU - Neijenhuijs, Koen I.

AU - Holtmaat, Karen

AU - Aaronson, Neil K.

AU - Holzner, Bernhard

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.

N1 - Copyright © 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - Introduction: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in men. Aim: To perform a systematic review of the measurement properties of the 15-item patient-reported outcome measure (IIEF-15) and the shortened 5-item version (IIEF-5). Methods: A systematic search of scientific literature up to April 2018 was performed. Data were extracted and analyzed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence of measurement properties was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence as very high, high, moderate, or low. Results: 40 studies were included. The evidence for criterion validity (of the Erectile Function subscale), and responsiveness of the IIEF-15 was sufficient (high quality), but inconsistent (moderate quality) for structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability. Evidence for structural validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the IIEF-5 was sufficient (moderate quality) but indeterminate for internal consistency, measurement error, and responsiveness. Clinical Implications: Lack of evidence for and evidence not supporting some of the measurement properties of the IIEF-15 and IIEF-5 shows the importance of further research on the validity of these questionnaires in clinical research and clinical practice. Strengths & Limitations: A strength of the current review is the use of predefined guidelines (COSMIN). A limitation of this review is the use of a precise rather than a sensitive search filter regarding measurement properties to identify studies to be included. Conclusion: The IIEF requires more research on structural validity (IIEF-15), internal consistency (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), construct validity (IIEF-15), measurement error (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), and responsiveness (IIEF-5). The most pressing matter for future research is determining the unidimensionality of the IIEF-5 and the exact factor structure of the IIEF-15. Neijenhuijs KI, Holtmaat K, Aaronson NK, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)—A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Sex Med 2019;16:1078–1091.

AB - Introduction: The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems in men. Aim: To perform a systematic review of the measurement properties of the 15-item patient-reported outcome measure (IIEF-15) and the shortened 5-item version (IIEF-5). Methods: A systematic search of scientific literature up to April 2018 was performed. Data were extracted and analyzed according to COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for structural validity, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, hypothesis testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Evidence of measurement properties was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate, and quality of evidence as very high, high, moderate, or low. Results: 40 studies were included. The evidence for criterion validity (of the Erectile Function subscale), and responsiveness of the IIEF-15 was sufficient (high quality), but inconsistent (moderate quality) for structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability. Evidence for structural validity, test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity of the IIEF-5 was sufficient (moderate quality) but indeterminate for internal consistency, measurement error, and responsiveness. Clinical Implications: Lack of evidence for and evidence not supporting some of the measurement properties of the IIEF-15 and IIEF-5 shows the importance of further research on the validity of these questionnaires in clinical research and clinical practice. Strengths & Limitations: A strength of the current review is the use of predefined guidelines (COSMIN). A limitation of this review is the use of a precise rather than a sensitive search filter regarding measurement properties to identify studies to be included. Conclusion: The IIEF requires more research on structural validity (IIEF-15), internal consistency (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), construct validity (IIEF-15), measurement error (IIEF-15 and IIEF-5), and responsiveness (IIEF-5). The most pressing matter for future research is determining the unidimensionality of the IIEF-5 and the exact factor structure of the IIEF-15. Neijenhuijs KI, Holtmaat K, Aaronson NK, et al. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)—A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties. J Sex Med 2019;16:1078–1091.

KW - COSMIN

KW - International Index of Erectile Function

KW - Measurement Properties

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066110016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066110016&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.010

M3 - Review article

VL - 16

SP - 1078

EP - 1091

JO - Journal of Sexual Medicine

JF - Journal of Sexual Medicine

SN - 1743-6095

IS - 7

ER -