The Local Economic Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction

J. Cust, S. Poelhekke

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Whether it is fair to characterize natural resource wealth as a curse is still debated. Most of the evidence derives from cross-country analyses, providing cases both for and against a potential resource curse. Scholars are increasingly turning to within-country evidence to deepen our understanding of the potential drivers, and outcomes, of resource wealth effects. Moving away from cross-country studies offers new perspectives on the resource curse debate and can help overcome concerns regarding endogeneity. Therefore, scholars are leveraging datasets that provide greater disaggregation of economic responses and exogenous identification of impacts. This article surveys the literature on these studies of local and regional effects of natural resource extraction. We discuss data availability and quality, recent advances in methodological tools, and the main findings of several research areas. These areas include the direct impact of natural resource production on local labor markets and welfare, the effects of government spending channels resulting from mining revenue, and regional spillovers. Finally, we take stock of the state of the literature and provide suggestions for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-268
JournalAnnual Review of Resource Economics
Volume7
Issue numberOctober
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Economic impact
Natural resources
Resource extraction
Resource curse
Endogeneity
Local labour markets
Revenue
Government spending
Wealth effect
Spillover
Regional effects
Resources
Disaggregation
Wealth
Cross-country study
Economics

Cite this

@article{fe0a41bd8230479a94ed3a452f191677,
title = "The Local Economic Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction",
abstract = "Whether it is fair to characterize natural resource wealth as a curse is still debated. Most of the evidence derives from cross-country analyses, providing cases both for and against a potential resource curse. Scholars are increasingly turning to within-country evidence to deepen our understanding of the potential drivers, and outcomes, of resource wealth effects. Moving away from cross-country studies offers new perspectives on the resource curse debate and can help overcome concerns regarding endogeneity. Therefore, scholars are leveraging datasets that provide greater disaggregation of economic responses and exogenous identification of impacts. This article surveys the literature on these studies of local and regional effects of natural resource extraction. We discuss data availability and quality, recent advances in methodological tools, and the main findings of several research areas. These areas include the direct impact of natural resource production on local labor markets and welfare, the effects of government spending channels resulting from mining revenue, and regional spillovers. Finally, we take stock of the state of the literature and provide suggestions for future research.",
author = "J. Cust and S. Poelhekke",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125106",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "251--268",
journal = "Annual Review of Resource Economics",
issn = "1941-1340",
publisher = "Annual Reviews Inc.",
number = "October",

}

The Local Economic Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction. / Cust, J.; Poelhekke, S.

In: Annual Review of Resource Economics, Vol. 7, No. October, 2015, p. 251-268.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Local Economic Impacts of Natural Resource Extraction

AU - Cust, J.

AU - Poelhekke, S.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Whether it is fair to characterize natural resource wealth as a curse is still debated. Most of the evidence derives from cross-country analyses, providing cases both for and against a potential resource curse. Scholars are increasingly turning to within-country evidence to deepen our understanding of the potential drivers, and outcomes, of resource wealth effects. Moving away from cross-country studies offers new perspectives on the resource curse debate and can help overcome concerns regarding endogeneity. Therefore, scholars are leveraging datasets that provide greater disaggregation of economic responses and exogenous identification of impacts. This article surveys the literature on these studies of local and regional effects of natural resource extraction. We discuss data availability and quality, recent advances in methodological tools, and the main findings of several research areas. These areas include the direct impact of natural resource production on local labor markets and welfare, the effects of government spending channels resulting from mining revenue, and regional spillovers. Finally, we take stock of the state of the literature and provide suggestions for future research.

AB - Whether it is fair to characterize natural resource wealth as a curse is still debated. Most of the evidence derives from cross-country analyses, providing cases both for and against a potential resource curse. Scholars are increasingly turning to within-country evidence to deepen our understanding of the potential drivers, and outcomes, of resource wealth effects. Moving away from cross-country studies offers new perspectives on the resource curse debate and can help overcome concerns regarding endogeneity. Therefore, scholars are leveraging datasets that provide greater disaggregation of economic responses and exogenous identification of impacts. This article surveys the literature on these studies of local and regional effects of natural resource extraction. We discuss data availability and quality, recent advances in methodological tools, and the main findings of several research areas. These areas include the direct impact of natural resource production on local labor markets and welfare, the effects of government spending channels resulting from mining revenue, and regional spillovers. Finally, we take stock of the state of the literature and provide suggestions for future research.

U2 - 10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125106

DO - 10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125106

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 251

EP - 268

JO - Annual Review of Resource Economics

JF - Annual Review of Resource Economics

SN - 1941-1340

IS - October

ER -