The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules

Davide Grossi, John-Jules Ch. Meyer, Frank Dignum

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The paper proposes a logical systematization of the notion of counts-as which is grounded on a very simple intuition about what counts-as statements actually mean, i.e., forms of classification. Moving from this analytical thesis the paper disentangles three semantically different readings of statements of the type "X counts as Y in context c", from the weaker notion of contextual classification to the stronger notion of constitutive rule. These many ways in which counts-as can be said are formally addressed by making use of modal logic techniques. The resulting framework allows for a formal characterization of all the involved notions and their reciprocal logical relationships. © 2007.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-217
JournalJournal of Applied Logic
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The many faces of counts-as: A formal analysis of constitutive rules'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this