The meaning of life … cycles: lessons from and for safe by design studies

Jeroen B. Guinée*, Reinout Heijungs, Martina G. Vijver, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Gara Villalba Mendez

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The concepts of Safe by Design (SbD) and Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) are receiving increasing attention. The definitions of both concepts include the term ‘life cycle’ in combination with the terms ‘chemical’, ‘material’ and ‘product’, but their meanings are not further elaborated and defined in scholarly publications on SbD/SSbD. Here, we address two research questions: (1) How are the terms chemical, material and product used and defined in the scholarly literature on SbD and SSbD; (2) How are life cycles defined and which are considered in the scholarly literature on SbD/SSbD? We found largely consistent, though still confusing, uses of the terms product, material and chemical and we found four types of life cycles in the reviewed papers. Using consistent definitions of the terms product, material and chemical, we reduce the four types of life cycles found to three types of distinctive life cycles: (1) the life cycle of a product; (2) the life cycle of a chemical in a specific product; (3) the life cycle of a chemical in all its product applications. We discuss the different trade-offs that each of these life cycle approaches can identify and argue that they are complementary and should preferably all be applied in SbD/SSbD studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7787-7800
Number of pages14
JournalGreen Chemistry
Volume24
Issue number20
Early online date7 Oct 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The meaning of life … cycles: lessons from and for safe by design studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this