Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | 2022 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions (ICTMOD) |
| Subtitle of host publication | [Proceedings] |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. |
| Pages | 1-5 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781665470278 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781665470285 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2022 |
| Event | 2022 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions, ICTMOD 2022 - Marrakech, Morocco Duration: 23 Nov 2022 → 25 Nov 2022 |
Conference
| Conference | 2022 IEEE International Conference on Technology Management, Operations and Decisions, ICTMOD 2022 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Morocco |
| City | Marrakech |
| Period | 23/11/22 → 25/11/22 |
Funding
REFERENCES [1] M. A. Khan, ‘ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis’, Res. Int. Bus. Financ., vol. 61, p. 101668, 2022. [2] J. E. Humphrey, D. D. Lee, and Y. Shen, ‘The independent effects of environmental, social and governance initiatives on the performance of UK firms’, Aust. J. Manag., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 135–151, 2012. [3] N. Nirino, G. Santoro, N. Miglietta, and R. Quaglia, ‘Corporate controversies and company’s financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices’, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 162, p. 120341, 2021. [4] M. Del Giudice, Z. Khan, M. De Silva, V. Scuotto, F. Caputo, and E. Carayannis, ‘The microlevel actions undertaken by owner‐managers in improving the sustainability practices of cultural and creative small and medium enterprises: A United Kingdom–Italy comparison’, J. Organ. Behav., vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 1396–1414, 2017. [5] S. Fiandrino, D. Busso, and D. Vrontis, ‘Sustainable responsible conduct beyond the boundaries of compliance: Lessons from Italian listed food and beverage companies’, Br. Food J., 2019. [6] R. Durand, L. Paugam, and H. Stolowy, ‘Do investors actually value sustainability indices? Replication, development, and new evidence on CSR visibility’, Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1471–1490, 2019. [7] G. Friede, T. Busch, and A. Bassen, ‘ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies’, J. Sustain. Financ. Invest., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 210–233, 2015. [8] M. Cappucci, ‘The ESG integration paradox’, J. Appl. Corp. Financ., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 22–28, 2018. [9] D. Z. X. Huang, ‘Environmental, social and governance factors and assessing firm value: valuation, signalling and stakeholder perspectives’, Account. Financ., vol. 62, no. S1, pp. 1983–2010, 2022. [10] R. M. Dangelico and P. Pontrandolfo, ‘Being “green and competitive”: The impact of environmental actions and collaborations on firm performance’, Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 413–430, 2015. [11] N. Chams, J. García-Blandón, and K. Hassan, ‘Role reversal! financial performance as an antecedent of ESG: The moderating effect of total quality management’, Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7026, 2021. [12] United Nations, ‘General assembly resolution A/RES/70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development’, New York, 2015. [13] European Commission, ‘Announcement A New European Bauhaus: oped article by Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission’, no. October, p. 2, 2020. [14] C. Bason, R. Conway, D. Hill, and M. Mazzucato, ‘A new Bauhaus for a Green Deal’, November.[Online] Available ucl. ac. uk/bartlett/public-purpose/sites/public-purpose/files/new_bauhaus_cb_rc_dh_mm_0. pdf [Accessed 20 March 2021], 2020. [15] M. Feldman, E. E. Johnson, R. Bellefleur, S. Dowden, and E. Talukder, ‘Evaluating the tail of the distribution: the economic contributions of frequently awarded government R&D recipients’, Res. Policy, vol. 51, no. 7, p. 104539, 2022. [16] J. Lerner, ‘The government as venture capitalist: The long-run impact of the SBIR program’, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1999. [17] S. T. Howell, ‘Financing constraints as barriers to innovation: Evidence from R&D grants to energy startups’, Available SSRN, vol. 2687457, 2015. [18] T. Hogan, M. Humphery‐Jenner, T. T. L. Huong, and R. Powell, ‘Market dominance, R&D grant funding, and innovation outcomes’, R&D Manag., 2021. [19] F. Ciampi, M. Faraoni, J. Ballerini, and F. Meli, ‘The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives’, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 176, p. 121383, 2022. [20] A. Bertello, A. Ferraris, P. De Bernardi, and B. Bertoldi, ‘Challenges to open innovation in traditional SMEs: an analysis of pre-competitive projects in university-industry-government collaboration’, Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 89–104, 2022. [21] C. Forliano, A. Ferraris, E. Bivona, and J. Couturier, ‘Pouring new wine into old bottles: A dynamic perspective of the interplay among environmental dynamism, capabilities development, and performance’, J. Bus. Res., vol. 142, pp. 448–463, 2022. [22] S. U. Rehman, S. Bresciani, D. Yahiaoui, and E. Giacosa, ‘Environmental sustainability orientation and corporate social responsibility influence on environmental performance of small and medium enterprises: The mediating effect of green capability’, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 2022. [23] N. Nirino, F. Petruzzella, G. M. Alam, and F. Campobasso, ‘Can sustainable practices protect investors during financial market instability? A multi-sector analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Manag. Decis., no. ahead-of-print, 2022. [24] E. Demers, J. Hendrikse, P. Joos, and B. Lev, ‘ESG did not immunize stocks during the COVID‐19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did’, J. Bus. Financ. Account., vol. 48, no. 3–4, pp. 433–462, 2021. [25] J. Surroca, J. A. Tribó, and S. Waddock, ‘Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources’, Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 463–490, 2010. [26] A. S. Garcia, W. Mendes-Da-Silva, and R. J. Orsato, ‘Corporate sustainability, capital markets, and ESG performance’, in Individual behaviors and technologies for financial innovations, Springer, 2019, pp. 287–309. [27] M. E. Elmaghrabi, ‘CSR committee attributes and CSR performance: UK evidence’, Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 892–919, 2021. [28] A. Willis, ‘The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments’, J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2003. [29] N. Nirino, A. Ferraris, N. Miglietta, and A. C. Invernizzi, ‘Intellectual capital: the missing link in the corporate social responsibility–financial performance relationship’, J. Intellect. Cap., 2020. [30] J. Ballerini, G. M. Alam, K. Zvarikova, and G. Santoro, ‘How emotions from content social relevance mediate social media engagement: evidence from European supermarkets during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Br. Food J., no. ahead-of-print, 2022. [31] R. M. Baron and D. A. Kenny, ‘The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.’, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 51, no. 6, p. 1173, 1986. [32] L. Lanahan and D. Armanios, ‘Does more certification always benefit a venture?’, Organ. Sci., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 931–947, 2018. [33] A. Lioui and Z. Sharma, ‘Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects’, Ecol. Econ., vol. 78, pp. 100–111, 2012. [34] J. Xu, F. Liu, and Y. Shang, ‘R&D investment, ESG performance and green innovation performance: Evidence from China’, Kybernetes, 2020. [35] K. Du and J. Li, ‘Towards a green world: How do green technology innovations affect total-factor carbon productivity’, Energy Policy, vol. 131, pp. 240–250, 2019. [36] K. Lee, B. C. Cin, and E. Y. Lee, ‘Environmental responsibility and firm performance: The application of an environmental, social and governance model’, Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2016.