Abstract
Organisations increasingly use digital nudges to influence their workforces' behaviour without coercion or incentives. This can expose employees to arbitrary domination by infringing on their autonomy through manipulation and indoctrination. Nudges might furthermore give rise to the phenomenon of organised immaturity. Adopting a balanced approach between overly optimistic and dystopian standpoints, I propose a framework for determining the moral permissibility of digital nudging in the workplace. In this regard, I argue that not only should organisations provide pre-discursive justification of nudges but they should also ensure that employees can challenge their implementation whenever necessary through legitimation procedures. Building on Rainer Forst's concept of the right to justification, this article offers a way to combine contract- and deliberation-based theories for addressing questions in business ethics. I further introduce the concept of meta-autonomy as a capacity that employees can acquire to counter threats of arbitrary domination and to mitigate organised immaturity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 502-531 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Business Ethics Quarterly |
Volume | 33 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 14 Apr 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for Business Ethics.
Keywords
- arbitrary domination
- autonomy
- contract theory
- deliberation
- digital workplace nudge