Abstract
People vary in their willingness to try new foods. This variation, which is most frequently measured using the Food Neophobia Scale (FNS; Pliner & Hobden, 1992), has been interpreted as unidimensional. In four studies (N's = 210, 306, 160, and 161), we 1) demonstrate that food neophobia varies across meat and plant dimensions, 2) explore the validity of a measure of meat and plant neophobia, and 3) test whether these food neophobia dimensions predict decisions to eat a novel food item (i.e., a snack bar that contains insects). Mixed-effects model across the four studies indicated that the two dimensions differentially relate to a number of variables, including disgust sensitivity, animal empathy, and masculinity. Women scored higher on meat neophobia than men, but the sexes did not differ on plant neophobia. Only meat neophobia uniquely predicted eating a novel insect-based snack bar. Overall, these results extend knowledge regarding orientations toward novel foods.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 105177 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-9 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Appetite |
Volume | 162 |
Early online date | 3 Mar 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
This record is sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Funding
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 680002 |
Keywords
- Disgust
- Entomophagy
- Food neophobia
- Food preferences
- Sex differences