Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies

  • Philip J. Ward*
  • , Marleen C. de Ruiter
  • , Johanna Mård
  • , Kai Schröter
  • , Anne Van Loon
  • , Ted Veldkamp
  • , Nina von Uexkull
  • , Niko Wanders
  • , Amir AghaKouchak
  • , Karsten Arnbjerg-Nielsen
  • , Lucinda Capewell
  • , Maria Carmen Llasat
  • , Rosie Day
  • , Benjamin Dewals
  • , Giuliano Di Baldassarre
  • , Laurie S. Huning
  • , Heidi Kreibich
  • , Maurizio Mazzoleni
  • , Elisa Savelli
  • , Claudia Teutschbein
  • Harmen van den Berg, Anne van der Heijden, Jelle M.R. Vincken, Maarten J. Waterloo, Marthe Wens
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

558 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Most research on hydrological risks focuses either on flood risk or drought risk, whilst floods and droughts are two extremes of the same hydrological cycle. To better design disaster risk reduction (DRR) measures and strategies, it is important to consider interactions between these closely linked phenomena. We show examples of: (a) how flood or drought DRR measures can have (unintended) positive or negative impacts on risk of the opposite hazard; and (b) how flood or drought DRR measures can be negatively impacted by the opposite hazard. We focus on dikes and levees, dams, stormwater control and upstream measures, subsurface storage, migration, agricultural practices, and vulnerability and preparedness. We identify key challenges for moving towards a more holistic risk management approach.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100070
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalWater Security
Volume11
Early online date10 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Funding

The research was developed by members of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences (IAHS) Panta Rhei Working Groups on ‘Changes in Flood Risk’ and ‘Drought in the Anthropocene’. PJW and MCR received funding from the Dutch Research Council (NWO), in the form of a VIDI grant [grant number 016.161.324]. NvU received funding from the Swedish Research Council [grant number 2016-06389]. MCLL has developed her contribution to this study in the framework of the Spanish National Project M-CostAdapt [CTM2017-83655-C2-2-R] and the Interreg V A project PIRAGUA [210/16]. NW received funding from the Dutch Research Council (NWO), in the form of a VENI grant [016.Veni.181.049]. KA-N received funding from the EU H2020 project RECONECT (grant no. 776866).

FundersFunder number
EU H2020776866
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek016.161.324
Vetenskapsrådet2016-06389

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation
      SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
    2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
      SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

    Keywords

    • Floods
    • Disaster risk reduction
    • Droughts
    • Risk

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The need to integrate flood and drought disaster risk reduction strategies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this