Abstract
Almost eight years since the Commission issued the proposal, the recast EU Reception Conditions Directive has finally been adopted. It is the only instrument of the Common European Asylum System that has not been transformed into a Regulation under the new Pact. According to the Commission, full harmonization is not feasible nor desirable, considering the ‘current significant differences in Member States’ social and economic conditions’. Accordingly, Member States need to transpose the relevant provisions into their domestic legislation. The implementation deadline is 12 June 2026.
I have analysed the 2018 political compromise on the recast reception conditions directive before. In this blogpost I analyse the new Reception Conditions Directive, in comparison to the former Reception Conditions Directive 2013/33/EU, in order to map the changes that are required in domestic law in the Member States. I do not present a full overview of the differences between the two instruments, but focus on the core novelties. I argue that the Directive ensures increased protection for (some) applicants for international protection, for example as regards access to the labour market, representation of unaccompanied minors, and the nature of the material reception conditions. At the same time, the Directive provides Member States more room to subject applicants to a significant degree of state control, for example by increasing the possibilities for excluding applicants from the full set of reception benefits and for limiting applicants’ freedom of movement.
I have analysed the 2018 political compromise on the recast reception conditions directive before. In this blogpost I analyse the new Reception Conditions Directive, in comparison to the former Reception Conditions Directive 2013/33/EU, in order to map the changes that are required in domestic law in the Member States. I do not present a full overview of the differences between the two instruments, but focus on the core novelties. I argue that the Directive ensures increased protection for (some) applicants for international protection, for example as regards access to the labour market, representation of unaccompanied minors, and the nature of the material reception conditions. At the same time, the Directive provides Member States more room to subject applicants to a significant degree of state control, for example by increasing the possibilities for excluding applicants from the full set of reception benefits and for limiting applicants’ freedom of movement.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Publisher | Odysseus Network |
Media of output | Online |
Publication status | Published - 30 Sept 2024 |