Abstract
The paper by Armbrster and Glckler (2007) contains some interesting material on the development of the consultancy industry and on the more recent nature of internationalization. However, their paper severely misrepresents and distorts most of what we have written. The argument it makes therefore does not affect what we have said, and it does not acknowledge that important parts of our treatment are compatible with what they say. In fact, the flow of discussion from our essai to theirs shows the continuing topicality of our worries and propositions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1887-1892 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Organization Studies |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Consulting and academia cooperation
- Management consulting
- Professional service firms
- Service economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The (non)sense of organizational change continued: A rejoinder to Armbrster and Glckler'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver