The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: towards a relational ontology of management accounting

E.G.J. Vosselman

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores accounting's mediating role in bringing theoretical statements from economics into life. It addresses the so-called performativity thesis that claims that economic theory does not just observe and explain a reality, but rather shapes, formats and performs reality. Accounting mediates in that process by creating cognitive boundaries that embed societal practices in economic theory. However, the performativity thesis is not without criticisms. Its main criticisms concern a lack of proof of the thesis; an overestimation of the power of economics to extend beyond the virtual; and a lack of a critical stance. In order to bring more nuance in the discussion on the performativity thesis the paper reflects on evidence from the field of accounting. The review of accounting studies reveals how accounting, to different degrees, is implicated in strategic and operational activities in markets and organisations and how it is a performative mechanism of economisation. Moreover, in order to accentuate the good in society and to challenge the bad, the paper suggests a further development of (critical) management accounting research into the performativity of both economics and other social theories. A relational ontology of management accounting that is in politics and that is sensitive to unlocalisable virtual powers of social-historical formations of management accounting may be developed. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)181-203
JournalAccounting and Business Research
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Ontology
Management accounting
Performativity
Economics
Criticism
Economic theory
Accounting research
Social theory
Critical management

Cite this

@article{a0e1f40ed8b84a5c96745d4e984e661f,
title = "The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: towards a relational ontology of management accounting",
abstract = "This paper explores accounting's mediating role in bringing theoretical statements from economics into life. It addresses the so-called performativity thesis that claims that economic theory does not just observe and explain a reality, but rather shapes, formats and performs reality. Accounting mediates in that process by creating cognitive boundaries that embed societal practices in economic theory. However, the performativity thesis is not without criticisms. Its main criticisms concern a lack of proof of the thesis; an overestimation of the power of economics to extend beyond the virtual; and a lack of a critical stance. In order to bring more nuance in the discussion on the performativity thesis the paper reflects on evidence from the field of accounting. The review of accounting studies reveals how accounting, to different degrees, is implicated in strategic and operational activities in markets and organisations and how it is a performative mechanism of economisation. Moreover, in order to accentuate the good in society and to challenge the bad, the paper suggests a further development of (critical) management accounting research into the performativity of both economics and other social theories. A relational ontology of management accounting that is in politics and that is sensitive to unlocalisable virtual powers of social-historical formations of management accounting may be developed. {\circledC} 2013 Taylor & Francis.",
author = "E.G.J. Vosselman",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/00014788.2013.856748",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "181--203",
journal = "Accounting and Business Research",
issn = "0001-4788",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: towards a relational ontology of management accounting. / Vosselman, E.G.J.

In: Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2014, p. 181-203.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ‘performativity thesis’ and its critics: towards a relational ontology of management accounting

AU - Vosselman, E.G.J.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper explores accounting's mediating role in bringing theoretical statements from economics into life. It addresses the so-called performativity thesis that claims that economic theory does not just observe and explain a reality, but rather shapes, formats and performs reality. Accounting mediates in that process by creating cognitive boundaries that embed societal practices in economic theory. However, the performativity thesis is not without criticisms. Its main criticisms concern a lack of proof of the thesis; an overestimation of the power of economics to extend beyond the virtual; and a lack of a critical stance. In order to bring more nuance in the discussion on the performativity thesis the paper reflects on evidence from the field of accounting. The review of accounting studies reveals how accounting, to different degrees, is implicated in strategic and operational activities in markets and organisations and how it is a performative mechanism of economisation. Moreover, in order to accentuate the good in society and to challenge the bad, the paper suggests a further development of (critical) management accounting research into the performativity of both economics and other social theories. A relational ontology of management accounting that is in politics and that is sensitive to unlocalisable virtual powers of social-historical formations of management accounting may be developed. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.

AB - This paper explores accounting's mediating role in bringing theoretical statements from economics into life. It addresses the so-called performativity thesis that claims that economic theory does not just observe and explain a reality, but rather shapes, formats and performs reality. Accounting mediates in that process by creating cognitive boundaries that embed societal practices in economic theory. However, the performativity thesis is not without criticisms. Its main criticisms concern a lack of proof of the thesis; an overestimation of the power of economics to extend beyond the virtual; and a lack of a critical stance. In order to bring more nuance in the discussion on the performativity thesis the paper reflects on evidence from the field of accounting. The review of accounting studies reveals how accounting, to different degrees, is implicated in strategic and operational activities in markets and organisations and how it is a performative mechanism of economisation. Moreover, in order to accentuate the good in society and to challenge the bad, the paper suggests a further development of (critical) management accounting research into the performativity of both economics and other social theories. A relational ontology of management accounting that is in politics and that is sensitive to unlocalisable virtual powers of social-historical formations of management accounting may be developed. © 2013 Taylor & Francis.

U2 - 10.1080/00014788.2013.856748

DO - 10.1080/00014788.2013.856748

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 181

EP - 203

JO - Accounting and Business Research

JF - Accounting and Business Research

SN - 0001-4788

IS - 2

ER -