The pitfalls of biodiversity proxies: Differences in richness patterns of birds, trees and understudied diversity across Amazonia

Camila D. Ritter*, Søren Faurby, Dominic J. Bennett, Luciano N. Naka, Hans ter Steege, Alexander Zizka, Quiterie Haenel, R. Henrik Nilsson, Alexandre Antonelli

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Most knowledge on biodiversity derives from the study of charismatic macro-organisms, such as birds and trees. However, the diversity of micro-organisms constitutes the majority of all life forms on Earth. Here, we ask if the patterns of richness inferred for macro-organisms are similar for micro-organisms. For this, we barcoded samples of soil, litter and insects from four localities on a west-to-east transect across Amazonia. We quantified richness as Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) in those samples using three molecular markers. We then compared OTU richness with species richness of two relatively well-studied organism groups in Amazonia: trees and birds. We find that OTU richness shows a declining west-to-east diversity gradient that is in agreement with the species richness patterns documented here and previously for birds and trees. These results suggest that most taxonomic groups respond to the same overall diversity gradients at large spatial scales. However, our results show a different pattern of richness in relation to habitat types, suggesting that the idiosyncrasies of each taxonomic group and peculiarities of the local environment frequently override large-scale diversity gradients. Our findings caution against using the diversity distribution of one taxonomic group as an indication of patterns of richness across all groups.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number19205
    Pages (from-to)1-13
    Number of pages13
    JournalScientific Reports
    Volume9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2019

    Funding

    We thank Rhian Smith and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments to the manuscript.We thank the Brazilian authorities ICMBio (registration number 48185-2) and IBAMA (registration number 127341) for the collection permits granted for this research; Anna Ansebo, Sven Toresson and Ylva Heed for laboratory and administrative assistance; and Mats Töpel for help with bioinformatics. We thank all plot owners of the Amazon Tree Diversity Network who contributed plot data to the ter Steege et al. (2013) publication for allowing us to use unpublished data. The authors acknowledge financial support from Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - Brazil: 249064/2013-8) for CDR, the Swedish Research Council (B0569601), the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013, ERC Grant Agreement n. 331024), the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research, the Biodiversity and Ecosystems in a Changing Climate (BECC) programme for AA. Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg.

    FundersFunder number
    Biodiversity and Ecosystems in a Changing Climate
    FP/2007
    Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
    Seventh Framework Programme
    European Research Council331024
    Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
    Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico249064/2013-8
    VetenskapsrådetB0569601

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'The pitfalls of biodiversity proxies: Differences in richness patterns of birds, trees and understudied diversity across Amazonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this