The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan

Masa Kageyama, Pascale Braconnot, Sandy P. Harrison, Alan M. Haywood, Johann H. Jungclaus, Bette L. Otto-Bliesner, Ayako Abe-Ouchi, Samuel Albani, Patrick J. Bartlein, Chris Brierley, Michel Crucifix, Aisling Dolan, Laura L. Fernandez-Donado, Hubertus Fischer, Peter O. Hopcroft, Ruza F. Ivanovic, Fabrice Lambert, Daniel J. Lunt, Natalie M. Mahowald, W. Richard Peltier & 7 others Steven J. Phipps, Didier M. Roche, Gavin A. Schmidt, Lev Tarasov, Paul J. Valdes, Qiong Zhang, Tianjun Zhou

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper is the first of a series of four GMD papers on the PMIP4-CMIP6 experiments. Part 2 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017) gives details about the two PMIP4-CMIP6 interglacial experiments, Part 3 (Jungclaus et al., 2017) about the last millennium experiment, and Part 4 (Kageyama et al., 2017) about the Last Glacial Maximum experiment. The mid-Pliocene Warm Period experiment is part of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) - Phase 2, detailed in Haywood et al. (2016).

The goal of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to different climate forcings for documented climatic states very different from the present and historical climates. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impact of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical, or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art numerical models simulate climate change. Climate models are usually developed using the present and historical climates as references, but climate projections show that future climates will lie well outside these conditions. Palaeoclimates very different from these reference states therefore provide stringent tests for state-of-the-art models and a way to assess whether their sensitivity to forcings is compatible with palaeoclimatic evidence. Simulations of five different periods have been designed to address the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6): the millennium prior to the industrial epoch (CMIP6 name: past1000); the mid-Holocene, 6000 years ago (midHolocene); the Last Glacial Maximum, 21ĝ€000 years ago (lgm); the Last Interglacial, 127ĝ€000 years ago (lig127k); and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, 3.2 million years ago (midPliocene-eoi400). These climatic periods are well documented by palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental records, with climate and environmental changes relevant for the study and projection of future climate changes. This paper describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments and database requests, with a focus on their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP. It also outlines the analysis plan that takes advantage of the comparisons of the results across periods and across CMIP6 in collaboration with other MIPs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1057
Number of pages25
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

arching
Climate
paleoclimate
climate
Climate change
Climate Change
experiment
Experiments
Pliocene
climate change
Experiment
Last Glacial Maximum
Forcing
modeling
Climate models
Modeling
Projection
climate forcing
Last Interglacial
Climate Models

Cite this

Kageyama, M., Braconnot, P., Harrison, S. P., Haywood, A. M., Jungclaus, J. H., Otto-Bliesner, B. L., ... Zhou, T. (2018). The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(3), 1033-1057. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018
Kageyama, Masa ; Braconnot, Pascale ; Harrison, Sandy P. ; Haywood, Alan M. ; Jungclaus, Johann H. ; Otto-Bliesner, Bette L. ; Abe-Ouchi, Ayako ; Albani, Samuel ; Bartlein, Patrick J. ; Brierley, Chris ; Crucifix, Michel ; Dolan, Aisling ; Fernandez-Donado, Laura L. ; Fischer, Hubertus ; Hopcroft, Peter O. ; Ivanovic, Ruza F. ; Lambert, Fabrice ; Lunt, Daniel J. ; Mahowald, Natalie M. ; Richard Peltier, W. ; Phipps, Steven J. ; Roche, Didier M. ; Schmidt, Gavin A. ; Tarasov, Lev ; Valdes, Paul J. ; Zhang, Qiong ; Zhou, Tianjun. / The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1 : Overview and over-arching analysis plan. In: Geoscientific Model Development. 2018 ; Vol. 11, No. 3. pp. 1033-1057.
@article{9ea79fd6a7dc46b580a3228c944e6643,
title = "The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan",
abstract = "This paper is the first of a series of four GMD papers on the PMIP4-CMIP6 experiments. Part 2 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017) gives details about the two PMIP4-CMIP6 interglacial experiments, Part 3 (Jungclaus et al., 2017) about the last millennium experiment, and Part 4 (Kageyama et al., 2017) about the Last Glacial Maximum experiment. The mid-Pliocene Warm Period experiment is part of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) - Phase 2, detailed in Haywood et al. (2016).The goal of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to different climate forcings for documented climatic states very different from the present and historical climates. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impact of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical, or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art numerical models simulate climate change. Climate models are usually developed using the present and historical climates as references, but climate projections show that future climates will lie well outside these conditions. Palaeoclimates very different from these reference states therefore provide stringent tests for state-of-the-art models and a way to assess whether their sensitivity to forcings is compatible with palaeoclimatic evidence. Simulations of five different periods have been designed to address the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6): the millennium prior to the industrial epoch (CMIP6 name: past1000); the mid-Holocene, 6000 years ago (midHolocene); the Last Glacial Maximum, 21ĝ€000 years ago (lgm); the Last Interglacial, 127ĝ€000 years ago (lig127k); and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, 3.2 million years ago (midPliocene-eoi400). These climatic periods are well documented by palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental records, with climate and environmental changes relevant for the study and projection of future climate changes. This paper describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments and database requests, with a focus on their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP. It also outlines the analysis plan that takes advantage of the comparisons of the results across periods and across CMIP6 in collaboration with other MIPs.",
author = "Masa Kageyama and Pascale Braconnot and Harrison, {Sandy P.} and Haywood, {Alan M.} and Jungclaus, {Johann H.} and Otto-Bliesner, {Bette L.} and Ayako Abe-Ouchi and Samuel Albani and Bartlein, {Patrick J.} and Chris Brierley and Michel Crucifix and Aisling Dolan and Fernandez-Donado, {Laura L.} and Hubertus Fischer and Hopcroft, {Peter O.} and Ivanovic, {Ruza F.} and Fabrice Lambert and Lunt, {Daniel J.} and Mahowald, {Natalie M.} and {Richard Peltier}, W. and Phipps, {Steven J.} and Roche, {Didier M.} and Schmidt, {Gavin A.} and Lev Tarasov and Valdes, {Paul J.} and Qiong Zhang and Tianjun Zhou",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "16",
doi = "10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "1033--1057",
journal = "Geoscientific Model Development",
issn = "1991-959X",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "3",

}

Kageyama, M, Braconnot, P, Harrison, SP, Haywood, AM, Jungclaus, JH, Otto-Bliesner, BL, Abe-Ouchi, A, Albani, S, Bartlein, PJ, Brierley, C, Crucifix, M, Dolan, A, Fernandez-Donado, LL, Fischer, H, Hopcroft, PO, Ivanovic, RF, Lambert, F, Lunt, DJ, Mahowald, NM, Richard Peltier, W, Phipps, SJ, Roche, DM, Schmidt, GA, Tarasov, L, Valdes, PJ, Zhang, Q & Zhou, T 2018, 'The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan' Geoscientific Model Development, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1033-1057. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018

The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1 : Overview and over-arching analysis plan. / Kageyama, Masa; Braconnot, Pascale; Harrison, Sandy P.; Haywood, Alan M.; Jungclaus, Johann H.; Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.; Abe-Ouchi, Ayako; Albani, Samuel; Bartlein, Patrick J.; Brierley, Chris; Crucifix, Michel; Dolan, Aisling; Fernandez-Donado, Laura L.; Fischer, Hubertus; Hopcroft, Peter O.; Ivanovic, Ruza F.; Lambert, Fabrice; Lunt, Daniel J.; Mahowald, Natalie M.; Richard Peltier, W.; Phipps, Steven J.; Roche, Didier M.; Schmidt, Gavin A.; Tarasov, Lev; Valdes, Paul J.; Zhang, Qiong; Zhou, Tianjun.

In: Geoscientific Model Development, Vol. 11, No. 3, 16.03.2018, p. 1033-1057.

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1

T2 - Overview and over-arching analysis plan

AU - Kageyama, Masa

AU - Braconnot, Pascale

AU - Harrison, Sandy P.

AU - Haywood, Alan M.

AU - Jungclaus, Johann H.

AU - Otto-Bliesner, Bette L.

AU - Abe-Ouchi, Ayako

AU - Albani, Samuel

AU - Bartlein, Patrick J.

AU - Brierley, Chris

AU - Crucifix, Michel

AU - Dolan, Aisling

AU - Fernandez-Donado, Laura L.

AU - Fischer, Hubertus

AU - Hopcroft, Peter O.

AU - Ivanovic, Ruza F.

AU - Lambert, Fabrice

AU - Lunt, Daniel J.

AU - Mahowald, Natalie M.

AU - Richard Peltier, W.

AU - Phipps, Steven J.

AU - Roche, Didier M.

AU - Schmidt, Gavin A.

AU - Tarasov, Lev

AU - Valdes, Paul J.

AU - Zhang, Qiong

AU - Zhou, Tianjun

PY - 2018/3/16

Y1 - 2018/3/16

N2 - This paper is the first of a series of four GMD papers on the PMIP4-CMIP6 experiments. Part 2 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017) gives details about the two PMIP4-CMIP6 interglacial experiments, Part 3 (Jungclaus et al., 2017) about the last millennium experiment, and Part 4 (Kageyama et al., 2017) about the Last Glacial Maximum experiment. The mid-Pliocene Warm Period experiment is part of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) - Phase 2, detailed in Haywood et al. (2016).The goal of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to different climate forcings for documented climatic states very different from the present and historical climates. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impact of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical, or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art numerical models simulate climate change. Climate models are usually developed using the present and historical climates as references, but climate projections show that future climates will lie well outside these conditions. Palaeoclimates very different from these reference states therefore provide stringent tests for state-of-the-art models and a way to assess whether their sensitivity to forcings is compatible with palaeoclimatic evidence. Simulations of five different periods have been designed to address the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6): the millennium prior to the industrial epoch (CMIP6 name: past1000); the mid-Holocene, 6000 years ago (midHolocene); the Last Glacial Maximum, 21ĝ€000 years ago (lgm); the Last Interglacial, 127ĝ€000 years ago (lig127k); and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, 3.2 million years ago (midPliocene-eoi400). These climatic periods are well documented by palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental records, with climate and environmental changes relevant for the study and projection of future climate changes. This paper describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments and database requests, with a focus on their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP. It also outlines the analysis plan that takes advantage of the comparisons of the results across periods and across CMIP6 in collaboration with other MIPs.

AB - This paper is the first of a series of four GMD papers on the PMIP4-CMIP6 experiments. Part 2 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017) gives details about the two PMIP4-CMIP6 interglacial experiments, Part 3 (Jungclaus et al., 2017) about the last millennium experiment, and Part 4 (Kageyama et al., 2017) about the Last Glacial Maximum experiment. The mid-Pliocene Warm Period experiment is part of the Pliocene Model Intercomparison Project (PlioMIP) - Phase 2, detailed in Haywood et al. (2016).The goal of the Paleoclimate Modelling Intercomparison Project (PMIP) is to understand the response of the climate system to different climate forcings for documented climatic states very different from the present and historical climates. Through comparison with observations of the environmental impact of these climate changes, or with climate reconstructions based on physical, chemical, or biological records, PMIP also addresses the issue of how well state-of-the-art numerical models simulate climate change. Climate models are usually developed using the present and historical climates as references, but climate projections show that future climates will lie well outside these conditions. Palaeoclimates very different from these reference states therefore provide stringent tests for state-of-the-art models and a way to assess whether their sensitivity to forcings is compatible with palaeoclimatic evidence. Simulations of five different periods have been designed to address the objectives of the sixth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6): the millennium prior to the industrial epoch (CMIP6 name: past1000); the mid-Holocene, 6000 years ago (midHolocene); the Last Glacial Maximum, 21ĝ€000 years ago (lgm); the Last Interglacial, 127ĝ€000 years ago (lig127k); and the mid-Pliocene Warm Period, 3.2 million years ago (midPliocene-eoi400). These climatic periods are well documented by palaeoclimatic and palaeoenvironmental records, with climate and environmental changes relevant for the study and projection of future climate changes. This paper describes the motivation for the choice of these periods and the design of the numerical experiments and database requests, with a focus on their novel features compared to the experiments performed in previous phases of PMIP and CMIP. It also outlines the analysis plan that takes advantage of the comparisons of the results across periods and across CMIP6 in collaboration with other MIPs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043982935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043982935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018

DO - 10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018

M3 - Review article

VL - 11

SP - 1033

EP - 1057

JO - Geoscientific Model Development

JF - Geoscientific Model Development

SN - 1991-959X

IS - 3

ER -

Kageyama M, Braconnot P, Harrison SP, Haywood AM, Jungclaus JH, Otto-Bliesner BL et al. The PMIP4 contribution to CMIP6 - Part 1: Overview and over-arching analysis plan. Geoscientific Model Development. 2018 Mar 16;11(3):1033-1057. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1033-2018