The Point of Political Belief

Michael Jonathan Hannon, Jeroen de Ridder

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

340 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

An intuitive and widely accepted view is that (a) beliefs aim at truth, (b) many citizens have stable and meaningful political beliefs, and (c) citizens choose to support political candidates or parties on the basis of their political beliefs. We argue that all three claims are false. First, we argue that political beliefs often differ from ordinary world-modeling beliefs because they do not aim at truth. Second, we draw on empirical evidence from political science and psychology to argue that most people lack stable and meaningful political beliefs. Third, we claim that the true psychological basis for voting behavior is not an individual’s political beliefs but rather group identity. Along the way, we reflect on what this means for normative democratic theory.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Political Epistemology
EditorsMichael Hannon, Jeroen de Ridder
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter14
Pages156-166
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781000371925
ISBN (Print)9780367345907
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Point of Political Belief'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this