The Political Consequences of Self-Insurance: Evidence from Central-Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia

Katerina Tertytchnaya, Catherine E. De Vries*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Does self-insurance, such as access to savings or assets, affect support for government? While existing research recognizes that households’ ability to privately manage income risk and economic uncertainty influences voter redistributive preferences, we know relatively little about how self-insurance affects evaluations of government in the first place. To gain traction on this question, we combine cross-sectional and panel public opinion surveys from 28 countries in Central Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia with macro-data on economic performance. Exploiting variation in citizen responses to the Great Recession, we show that by enabling citizens to smooth consumption, self-insurance affects how they form economic perceptions. Moreover, we find that self-insurance bolsters support for incumbents. Results allow us to better understand why economic downturns may not dampen support for government, even when economic hardship is rife and access to public safety nets is limited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1047-1070
Number of pages24
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 1 Jan 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Central-Eastern Europe
  • Economic perceptions
  • Public opinion
  • Russia
  • Self-insurance
  • The Caucasus and Central Asia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Political Consequences of Self-Insurance: Evidence from Central-Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this