The potential risk of using historic claims to set bundled payment prices: the case of physical therapy after lower extremity joint replacement

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the most significant challenges of implementing a multi-provider bundled payment contract is to determine an appropriate, casemix-adjusted total bundle price. The most frequently used approach is to leverage historic care utilization based on claims data. However, those claims data may not accurately reflect appropriate care (e.g. due to supplier induced demand and moral hazard effects). This study aims to examine variation in claims-based costs of post-discharge primary care physical therapy (PT) utilization after total knee and hip arthroplasties (TKA/THA) for osteoarthritis patients.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used multilevel linear regression analyses to predict the factors that explain the variation in the utilization of post-discharge PT after TKA or THA for osteoarthritis patients, based on the historic (2015-2018) claims data of a large Dutch health insurer. The factors were structured as predisposing, enabling or need factors according to the behavioral model of Andersen.

RESULTS: The 15,309 TKA and 14,325 THA patients included in this study received an average of 20.7 (SD 11.3) and 16.7 (SD 10.1) post-discharge PT sessions, respectively. Results showed that the enabling factor 'presence of supplementary insurance' was the strongest predictor for post-discharge PT utilization in both groups (TKA: β = 7.46, SE = 0.498, p-value< 0.001; THA: β = 5.72, SE = 0.515, p-value< 0.001). There were also some statistically significant predisposing and need factors, but their effects were smaller.

CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that if enabling factors (such as supplementary insurance coverage or co-payments) are not taken into account in risk-adjustment of the bundle price, they may cause historic claims-based pricing methods to over- or underestimate appropriate post-discharge primary care PT use, which would result in a bundle price that is either too high or too low. Not adjusting bundle prices for all relevant casemix factors is a risk because it can hamper the successful implementation of bundled payment contracts and the desired changes in care delivery it aims to support.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1061
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalBMC health services research
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

© 2022. The Author(s).

Funding

The authors gratefully thank drs. K. Thompson for her thoughtful comments and drs. O. van der Galiën for his support with data collection. Kristina Thompson. MSc. PhD candidate in health economics. VU University Amsterdam. Onno van der Galiën, MSc. Senior research consultant and epidemiologist. Zilveren Kruis Achmea.

Keywords

  • Aftercare/economics
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Insurance Claim Review
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Patient Care Bundles
  • Patient Discharge
  • Physical Therapy Modalities/economics
  • Retrospective Studies
  • United States

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The potential risk of using historic claims to set bundled payment prices: the case of physical therapy after lower extremity joint replacement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this