The Power of Arguments: How Entrepreneurs Convince Stakeholders of the Legitimate Distinctiveness of their Ventures

R. van Werven, O. Bouwmeester, J.P. Cornelissen

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Entrepreneurs gain positive evaluations when their stakeholders are convinced that a new venture is simultaneously legitimate and distinct. Prior research highlights that analogies are a powerful device for constructing such legitimate distinctiveness. We extend this work by providing a more comprehensive typology of arguments that, besides analogies, contains five additional arguments that entrepreneurs can use to gain legitimacy and support for their ventures. We use this rhetorical typology in turn to consider how the nature of the business concept associated with a new venture constrains the choice, and effects, of certain arguments. Our typology provides a base for future research on the micro-discursive processes through which entrepreneurs claim, and in turn achieve, legitimate distinctiveness for their ventures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)616-631
JournalJournal of Business Venturing
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Industry
Stakeholders
Entrepreneurs
Venture
Distinctiveness
New ventures
Evaluation
Rhetoric
Business concept
Legitimacy

Bibliographical note

Volume 30, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages 616–631

Cite this

@article{face4906b58b4aefabe54b5df1885902,
title = "The Power of Arguments: How Entrepreneurs Convince Stakeholders of the Legitimate Distinctiveness of their Ventures",
abstract = "Entrepreneurs gain positive evaluations when their stakeholders are convinced that a new venture is simultaneously legitimate and distinct. Prior research highlights that analogies are a powerful device for constructing such legitimate distinctiveness. We extend this work by providing a more comprehensive typology of arguments that, besides analogies, contains five additional arguments that entrepreneurs can use to gain legitimacy and support for their ventures. We use this rhetorical typology in turn to consider how the nature of the business concept associated with a new venture constrains the choice, and effects, of certain arguments. Our typology provides a base for future research on the micro-discursive processes through which entrepreneurs claim, and in turn achieve, legitimate distinctiveness for their ventures.",
author = "{van Werven}, R. and O. Bouwmeester and J.P. Cornelissen",
note = "Volume 30, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages 616–631",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.001",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "616--631",
journal = "Journal of Business Venturing",
issn = "0883-9026",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

The Power of Arguments: How Entrepreneurs Convince Stakeholders of the Legitimate Distinctiveness of their Ventures. / van Werven, R.; Bouwmeester, O.; Cornelissen, J.P.

In: Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 30, No. 4, 2015, p. 616-631.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Power of Arguments: How Entrepreneurs Convince Stakeholders of the Legitimate Distinctiveness of their Ventures

AU - van Werven, R.

AU - Bouwmeester, O.

AU - Cornelissen, J.P.

N1 - Volume 30, Issue 4, July 2015, Pages 616–631

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Entrepreneurs gain positive evaluations when their stakeholders are convinced that a new venture is simultaneously legitimate and distinct. Prior research highlights that analogies are a powerful device for constructing such legitimate distinctiveness. We extend this work by providing a more comprehensive typology of arguments that, besides analogies, contains five additional arguments that entrepreneurs can use to gain legitimacy and support for their ventures. We use this rhetorical typology in turn to consider how the nature of the business concept associated with a new venture constrains the choice, and effects, of certain arguments. Our typology provides a base for future research on the micro-discursive processes through which entrepreneurs claim, and in turn achieve, legitimate distinctiveness for their ventures.

AB - Entrepreneurs gain positive evaluations when their stakeholders are convinced that a new venture is simultaneously legitimate and distinct. Prior research highlights that analogies are a powerful device for constructing such legitimate distinctiveness. We extend this work by providing a more comprehensive typology of arguments that, besides analogies, contains five additional arguments that entrepreneurs can use to gain legitimacy and support for their ventures. We use this rhetorical typology in turn to consider how the nature of the business concept associated with a new venture constrains the choice, and effects, of certain arguments. Our typology provides a base for future research on the micro-discursive processes through which entrepreneurs claim, and in turn achieve, legitimate distinctiveness for their ventures.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.08.001

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 616

EP - 631

JO - Journal of Business Venturing

JF - Journal of Business Venturing

SN - 0883-9026

IS - 4

ER -