[The practice of systematic reviews. II. Searching and selection of studies]

W J Assendelft, M W van Tulder, R J Scholten, L M Bouter

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Structured searching and selection of studies is an important component of a systematic review. It is recommended to record the various steps in a protocol in advance. The thoroughness of the searching and selection will partially depend on the available resources, like manpower and funds. A search action should be based on an unequivocally formulated research or clinical question, that is operationalized into clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. The actual start of a search strategy is a search in preferably multiple databases like Medline and EMBASE-Excerpta Medica. Additional search actions can be performed in trial registers and printed indexes and by correspondence with experts and hand searching of journals. Storage of the search results in a bibliographic database is recommended. Various methodological problems may play a role in searching and selecting studies for a review: studies may selectively not be published, results are only partially presented in the publication, studies are selectively included in reference lists, and reviewers themselves may make systematic errors in the selection process.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNed Tijdschr Geneeskd
Pages656-661
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Publication series

NameNed Tijdschr Geneeskd
Volume143

Keywords

  • *Information-Storage-and-Retrieval
  • Bias-Epidemiology
  • Databases,-Bibliographic
  • English-Abstract
  • Netherlands-
  • Online-Systems-Classification
  • Publishing-
  • Registries-
  • Research-
  • Selection-Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '[The practice of systematic reviews. II. Searching and selection of studies]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this