Abstract
Structured searching and selection of studies is an important component of a systematic review. It is recommended to record the various steps in a protocol in advance. The thoroughness of the searching and selection will partially depend on the available resources, like manpower and funds. A search action should be based on an unequivocally formulated research or clinical question, that is operationalized into clear inclusion and exclusion criteria. The actual start of a search strategy is a search in preferably multiple databases like Medline and EMBASE-Excerpta Medica. Additional search actions can be performed in trial registers and printed indexes and by correspondence with experts and hand searching of journals. Storage of the search results in a bibliographic database is recommended. Various methodological problems may play a role in searching and selecting studies for a review: studies may selectively not be published, results are only partially presented in the publication, studies are selectively included in reference lists, and reviewers themselves may make systematic errors in the selection process.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd |
| Pages | 656-661 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Publication series
| Name | Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd |
|---|---|
| Volume | 143 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- *Information-Storage-and-Retrieval
- Bias-Epidemiology
- Databases,-Bibliographic
- English-Abstract
- Netherlands-
- Online-Systems-Classification
- Publishing-
- Registries-
- Research-
- Selection-Genetics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '[The practice of systematic reviews. II. Searching and selection of studies]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver