TY - JOUR
T1 - The prevalence of dyads in social life
AU - Peperkoorn, Leonard S.
AU - Becker, D. Vaughn
AU - Balliet, Daniel
AU - Columbus, Simon
AU - Molho, Catherine
AU - Van Lange, Paul A.M.
PY - 2020/12/28
Y1 - 2020/12/28
N2 - A salient objective feature of the social environment in which people find themselves is group size. Knowledge of group size is highly relevant to behavioural scientists given that humans spend considerable time in social settings and the number of others influences much of human behaviour. What size of group do people actually look for and encounter in everyday life? Here we report four survey studies and one experience-sampling study (total N = 4,398) which provide evidence for the predominance of the dyad in daily life. Relative to larger group sizes, dyads are most common across a wide range of activities (e.g., conversations, projects, holidays, movies, sports, bars) obtained from three time moments (past activities, present, and future activities), sampling both mixed-sex and same-sex groups, with three different methodological approaches (retrospective reports, real-time data capture, and preference measures) in the United States and the Netherlands. We offer four mechanisms that may help explain this finding: reciprocity, coordination, social exclusion, and reproduction. The present findings advance our understanding of how individuals organize themselves in everyday life.
AB - A salient objective feature of the social environment in which people find themselves is group size. Knowledge of group size is highly relevant to behavioural scientists given that humans spend considerable time in social settings and the number of others influences much of human behaviour. What size of group do people actually look for and encounter in everyday life? Here we report four survey studies and one experience-sampling study (total N = 4,398) which provide evidence for the predominance of the dyad in daily life. Relative to larger group sizes, dyads are most common across a wide range of activities (e.g., conversations, projects, holidays, movies, sports, bars) obtained from three time moments (past activities, present, and future activities), sampling both mixed-sex and same-sex groups, with three different methodological approaches (retrospective reports, real-time data capture, and preference measures) in the United States and the Netherlands. We offer four mechanisms that may help explain this finding: reciprocity, coordination, social exclusion, and reproduction. The present findings advance our understanding of how individuals organize themselves in everyday life.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098960041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098960041&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244188
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0244188
M3 - Article
C2 - 33370332
AN - SCOPUS:85098960041
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 15
SP - 1
EP - 17
JO - PLoS ONE
JF - PLoS ONE
IS - 12
M1 - e0244188
ER -