Abstract
Non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) play an important role in the management of older people receiving homecare. However, little is known about how often specific NPIs are being used and to what extent usage varies between countries. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of NPIs in older homecare recipients in six European countries.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study of older homecare recipients (65+) using baseline data from the longitudinal cohort study ‘Identifying best practices for care-dependent elderly by Benchmarking Costs and outcomes of community care’ (IBenC). The analyzed NPIs are based on the interRAI Home Care instrument, a comprehensive geriatric assessment instrument. The prevalence of 24 NPIs was analyzed in Belgium, Germany, Finland, Iceland, Italy and the Netherlands. NPIs from seven groups were considered: psychosocial interventions, physical activity, regular care interventions, special therapies, preventive measures, special aids and environmental interventions.
Results
A total of 2884 homecare recipients were included. The mean age at baseline was 82.9 years and of all participants, 66.9% were female. The intervention with the highest prevalence in the study sample was ‘emergency assistance available’ (74%). Two other highly prevalent interventions were ‘physical activity’ (69%) and ‘home nurse’ (62%). Large differences between countries in the use of NPIs were observed and included, for example, ‘going outside’ (range 7–82%), ‘home health aids’ (range 12–93%), and ‘physician visit’ (range 24–94%).
Conclusions
The use of NPIs varied considerably between homecare users in different European countries. It is important to better understand the barriers and facilitators of use of these potentially beneficial interventions in order to design successful uptake strategies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-252 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | European Geriatric Medicine |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 4 Oct 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2024 |
Funding
This study was carried out as part of the I-CARE4OLD project. I-CARE4OLD has received funding from the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 965341. Views and opinions expressed are, however, those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them. More information on the I-CARE4OLD project can be found at http://www.icare4old.eu and https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/965341 . The IBenC project was funded by the 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission (Grant no. 305912). The contents of this article reflect only the authors\u2019 views and the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. JP and DF were supported by the Cooperation research program of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Charles University, Czech Republic.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| 7th Framework Programme of the European Commission | |
| Seventh Framework Programme | |
| Seventh Framework Programme | |
| Univerzita Karlova v Praze | |
| European Commission | 305912 |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 965341 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The prevalence of non-pharmacological interventions in older homecare recipients: an overview from six European countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver