The Problematic Character of Sola Scriptura

    Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    601 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article argues that the well-known phrase sola scriptura, that has become a shorthand for the orthodox protestant view of the authority of Scripture, is not or no longer adequate to express that view. It first highlights the origin of the triad sola scriptura, sola gratia, sola fide¸ and then argues that the expression is problematic because of the relationship between Scripture and tradition, the indispensableness of hermeneutics, the importance of general revelation for the understanding of Scripture, and the intrinsic relationship between the self-convincing nature of Scripture as God’s revelation and the witness of the Holy Spirit in the church in general and in the individual believers. Rather than from Scripture alone, protestant theology should be developed from Scripture as the primary and supreme authority, within the hermeneutical context of the confession of the Church of all ages, and in the acknowledgement that Scripture as such is insufficient without the illuminating work of the Holy Spirit.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationSola Scriptura
    Subtitle of host publicationBiblical and Theological Perspectives on Scripture, Authority, and Hermeneutics
    EditorsHans Burger, Arnold Huijgen, Eric Peels
    PublisherBrill
    Chapter2
    Pages38-55
    Number of pages18
    ISBN (Electronic)9789004356436
    ISBN (Print)9789004355170
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Publication series

    NameStudies in Reformed Theology
    Volume32

    Keywords

    • Tradition
    • autopistia of Scripture
    • hermeneutics
    • sufficiency of Scripture
    • witness of the Holy Spirit

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Problematic Character of Sola Scriptura'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this