The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?

  • Merle Marie Pittelkow*
  • , Sarahanne M. Field
  • , Peder M. Isager
  • , Anna E. Van't Veer
  • , Thomas Anderson
  • , Scott N. Cole
  • , Tomáš Dominik
  • , Roger Giner-Sorolla
  • , Sebahat Gok
  • , Tom Heyman
  • , Marc Jekel
  • , Timothy J. Luke
  • , David B. Mitchell
  • , Rik Peels
  • , Rosina Pendrous
  • , Samuel Sarrazin
  • , Jacob M. Schauer
  • , Eva Specker
  • , Ulrich S. Tran
  • , Marek A. Vranka
  • Jelte M. Wicherts, Naoto Yoshimura, Rolf A. Zwaan, Don Van Ravenzwaaij
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.

Original languageEnglish
Article number210586
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalRoyal Society Open Science
Volume10
Issue number2
Early online date1 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
M.-M.P. and D.v.R. were supported by an NWO Vidi grant to D.v.R. (016.Vidi.188.001). Acknowledgements

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors.

Funding

M.-M.P. and D.v.R. were supported by an NWO Vidi grant to D.v.R. (016.Vidi.188.001). Acknowledgements

FundersFunder number
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science22KJ3041

    Keywords

    • consensus
    • replication
    • study selection

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this