Abstract
Reputation literature has provided crucial insights about the evolution of the US regulatory state. Daniel Carpenter’s influential account painstakingly demonstrates the relevance of reputation to bureaucratic ‘power’ and to early institutional state-building in the US context. We argue that adopting a reputational lens provides important insights for the EU regulatory state, the evolution of its regulatory agents, and their efforts at legitimation. This contribution proposes a novel research agenda by applying core bureaucratic reputation concepts and arguments to the scholarship on the EU regulatory state and its core actors to explore the following questions: To what extent does the theory ‘travel well’ in an EU context? Does it have purchase power, and what can it contribute to our understanding of the evolution of the EU regulatory state and the behaviour and legitimacy of supranational regulators?.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1256-1269 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of European Public Policy |
Volume | 27 |
Issue number | 8 |
Early online date | 25 Dec 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2 Aug 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Special Issue: Best papers from the European Union Studies Association 2019 Biennial Conference, Denver, USA. Edited by Matthias Matthijs.© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Funding
This article is part of a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 716439). We thank Torbjørg Jevnaker, Caelesta Braun, Markus Haverland, and other participants at the Netherlands Institute of Government (NIG) Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1–2 November 2018 for their constructive comments. All mistakes remain our own.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 716439 |
European Research Council | |
Netherlands Institute of Government |