Abstract
This study examined the reciprocal associations between quantitative job insecurity, job satisfaction, and psychological distress using a cross-lagged panel design. Based on the Conservation of Resources theory, it was hypothesized that quantitative job insecurity negatively affects job satisfaction (short-term) and subsequently leads to psychological distress (long-term), with job satisfaction mediating this relationship. A survey of 347 Italian employees across three waves (four-month intervals) during the Covid-19 pandemic was conducted. Contrary to expectations, the reverse causation model fit the data better, indicating that psychological distress predicted increased quantitative job insecurity and decreased job satisfaction. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 598-617 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Economic and Industrial Democracy |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 27 Jun 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2025
Keywords
- cross-lagged panel study
- job insecurity
- job satisfaction
- longitudinal study
- psychological distress
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The reciprocal relationships between quantitative job insecurity, job satisfaction, and psychological distress during the Covid-19 pandemic: A three-wave cross-lagged panel study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver