The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe: Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany

Research output: Contribution to JournalComment / Letter to the editorAcademic

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-28
Number of pages2
JournalClinical Psychological Science
Volume7
Issue number1
Early online date24 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Cite this

@article{41a3a27674b3474fbc6e709e162be80f,
title = "The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe: Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany",
author = "Julia Shaw and Annelies Vredeveldt",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2167702618803649",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "27--28",
journal = "Clinical Psychological Science",
issn = "2167-7026",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe : Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany. / Shaw, Julia; Vredeveldt, Annelies.

In: Clinical Psychological Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 27-28.

Research output: Contribution to JournalComment / Letter to the editorAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Recovered Memory Debate Continues in Europe

T2 - Evidence From the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, France, and Germany

AU - Shaw, Julia

AU - Vredeveldt, Annelies

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058686116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058686116&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2167702618803649

DO - 10.1177/2167702618803649

M3 - Comment / Letter to the editor

VL - 7

SP - 27

EP - 28

JO - Clinical Psychological Science

JF - Clinical Psychological Science

SN - 2167-7026

IS - 1

ER -