The reflection of principles and values in worldwide organic agricultural research viewed through a crop diversification lens. A bibliometric review

Pierre Chopin*, Alexander Menegat, Göran Bergkvist, Steffen Dahlke, Ortrud Jäck, Ida Karlsson, Marcos Lana, Tove Ortman, Rafaelle Reumaux, Ingrid Öborn, Christine A. Watson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Organic agriculture and organic food have expanded in recent decades but have undergone conventionalisation. Some claim that this contradicts some or all of the principles of ‘health’, ‘ecology’, ‘fairness’ and ‘care’ established by the International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movement (IFOAM). It is currently unclear how research on organic food/agriculture is structured, whether it embraces these principles, or how key crop diversification, driving sustainability, are addressed. To fill these knowledge gaps, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of 10,030 peer-reviewed articles published from 1945 to 2021 with topic and textual analysis. Our main findings were the following: (1) research is compartmentalised into scales and disciplines, with at field-scale ‘weed’, ‘soil’, ‘pest and disease’ management and ‘livestock farming’ seldom addressed together, or with environmental assessment separated from socioeconomic studies at farm scale. (2) The proportion of publications on ‘consumers’ preferences’ and ‘product quality’ research almost tripled in 20 years, from 10 to 27%, emphasizing the consumer orientation of research on organic agriculture and organic food. (3) Only 4% of articles covered all four IFOAM principles, while associated values such as ‘resilience’, ‘integrity’, ‘equity’, ‘transparency’ and ‘justice’ were even less frequently addressed. (4) Fewer diversification practices have been tested in organic than in conventional agriculture research, with fewer articles on ‘crop mixtures’ or ‘bee-friendly crops’ and a smaller range of legumes considered. (5) Research on genetic improvement and processing of organic legumes is lacking, which could constrain adoption of legumes in organic farming even more than in conventional agriculture. These results indicate a need for increasing interdisciplinary efforts at field level, with systematic measurement of multiple processes (weed-nutrient-pest dynamics). Future studies on organic agriculture should combine several diversification practices and legumes, with relevant indicators addressing the IFOAM values explicitly, and consider the whole value chain by linking producers with consumers.

Original languageEnglish
Article number23
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalAgronomy for Sustainable Development
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date14 Feb 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Open access funding provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. This study formed part of the Swedish Research Council for Environment Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS) projects ‘Fostering organic cultivation of grain legumes; a multi-scale feasibility study for soybean and lupine production in Sweden’ (grant number: 2018-02402_Formas); ‘Sustainable organic food from heritage cereal – using history to form the future’ (grant number: 2018-02393_Formas); and ‘Investigating factors determining constraints on the expansion of organic farming in Sweden’ (grant number: 2018-02396_Formas), and the SLU Platform for Crop Production Systems and Platform for Plant Protection.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Bibliometric analysis
  • Consumers’ preferences
  • Crop diversification
  • Food system analysis
  • Legume adoption
  • Organic agriculture
  • Organic food
  • Organic food supply chain (OFSC)
  • Principles of organic agriculture

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The reflection of principles and values in worldwide organic agricultural research viewed through a crop diversification lens. A bibliometric review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this