Abstract
How can violence as evil be represented in art and what do works of art evoke in the viewer? Two closely related questions on the representation of violence as evil are discussed. The first is whether there is an ethical limit to the representation of evil, that is, the issue posed with respect to the (im)possibility of Holocaust art. Works by Anselm Kiefer are compared to Holocaust art in the exhibition Mirroring Evil: Nazi Imagery /Recent Art (New York, 2002). The second question concerns the difference between art and life with respect to the representation of evil. Bin Laden’s live image of 9/11 is compared to Richter’s painting September. The former is life as a reality show; Bin Laden’s image can petrify the viewer. The latter is art, and Richter’s style of blurred realism distances the viewer from the event so that he can arrive at a moral and political position regarding terrorism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 432-443 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | International Journal for Philosophy of Religion |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 4/5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Volume 78, 2017 - Issue 4-5: EvilUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Art, Evil, Aesthetics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The representation of violence as evil in contemporary art: the power of the image in Kiefer, Richter, and Bin Laden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver