Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The representation of violence as evil in contemporary art: the power of the image in Kiefer, Richter, and Bin Laden

  • W. Stoker

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    How can violence as evil be represented in art and what do works of art evoke in the viewer? Two closely related questions on the representation of violence as evil are discussed. The first is whether there is an ethical limit to the representation of evil, that is, the issue posed with respect to the (im)possibility of Holocaust art. Works by Anselm Kiefer are compared to Holocaust art in the exhibition Mirroring Evil: Nazi Imagery /Recent Art (New York, 2002). The second question concerns the difference between art and life with respect to the representation of evil. Bin Laden’s live image of 9/11 is compared to Richter’s painting September. The former is life as a reality show; Bin Laden’s image can petrify the viewer. The latter is art, and Richter’s style of blurred realism distances the viewer from the event so that he can arrive at a moral and political position regarding terrorism.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)432-443
    Number of pages12
    JournalInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion
    Volume78
    Issue number4/5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

    Bibliographical note

    Volume 78, 2017 - Issue 4-5: Evil

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Art, Evil, Aesthetics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The representation of violence as evil in contemporary art: the power of the image in Kiefer, Richter, and Bin Laden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this