The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5

Vilma Kangasaho*, Aki Tsuruta, Leif Backman, Pyry Mäkinen, Sander Houweling, Arjo Segers, Maarten Krol, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Sylvia Michel, James W.C. White, Tuula Aalto

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the contribution of different CH4 sources to the seasonal cycle of δ13C during 2000–2012 by using the TM5 atmospheric transport model, including spatially varying information on isotopic signatures. The TM5 model is able to produce the background seasonality of δ13C, but the discrepancies compared to the observations arise from incomplete representation of the emissions and their source-specific signatures. Seasonal cycles of δ13C are found to be an inverse of CH4 cycles in general, but the anti-correlations between CH4 and δ13C are imperfect and experience a large variation (ρ = −0.35 to −0.91) north of 30° S. We found that wetland emissions are an important driver in the δ13C seasonal cycle in the Northern Hemisphere and Tropics, and in the Southern Hemisphere Tropics, emissions from fires contribute to the enrichment of δ13C in July–October. The comparisons to the observations from 18 stations globally showed that the seasonal cycle of EFMM emissions in the EDGAR v5.0 inventory is more realistic than in v4.3.2. At northern stations (north of 55° N), modeled δ13C amplitudes are generally smaller by 12–68%, mainly because the model could not reproduce the strong depletion in autumn. This indicates that the CH4 emission magnitude and seasonal cycle of wetlands may need to be revised. In addition, results from stations in northern latitudes (19–40° N) indicate that the proportion of biogenic to fossil-based emissions may need to be revised, such that a larger portion of fossil-based emissions is needed during summer.

Original languageEnglish
Article number888
Pages (from-to)1-24
Number of pages24
JournalAtmosphere
Volume13
Issue number6
Early online date30 May 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding: We would like to thank the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation, the Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation, Academy of Finland (307331 UPFORMET), EU-H2020 VERIFY, and ESA-MethEO, for financial support. The VERIFY project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 776810. Maarten Krol is supported by funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 742798.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Funding: We would like to thank the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation, the Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation, Academy of Finland (307331 UPFORMET), EU-H2020 VERIFY, and ESA-MethEO, for financial support. The VERIFY project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 776810. Maarten Krol is supported by funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 742798.

FundersFunder number
ESA-MethEO
Vilho, Yrjö and Kalle Väisälä Foundation
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme776810, 742798
European Research Council
Academy of Finland307331 UPFORMET, EU-H2020
Magnus Ehrnroothin Säätiö

    Keywords

    • isotope
    • methane
    • seasonal cycle

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this