The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: Towards theoretical integration

Jan‐Willem van Prooijen*, Kees van den Bos, Henk A.M. Wilke

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    : In the current chapter, the authors explore the relation between social standing and procedural justice. Standing is an important construct in procedural justice theories and tends to be broadly defined as the position that people have in social groups. It is argued that the standing construct suffers from conceptual ambiguity: In procedural justice literature two distinct interpretations of standing can be distinguished, one defining standing as intragroup status and one defining standing as the extent to which people are included in social groups. Furthermore, it is argued that research findings on the relation between standing and procedural justice are not conclusive. The authors review recent empirical findings that address these concerns, and conceptually integrate these findings. In closing, the authors outline avenues for future research that the procedural justice field may want to take, and discuss implications of the work reviewed here.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)33-58
    Number of pages26
    JournalEuropean Review of Social Psychology
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice: Towards theoretical integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this