TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of standing in the psychology of procedural justice
T2 - Towards theoretical integration
AU - van Prooijen, Jan‐Willem
AU - van den Bos, Kees
AU - Wilke, Henk A.M.
PY - 2004/1/1
Y1 - 2004/1/1
N2 - : In the current chapter, the authors explore the relation between social standing and procedural justice. Standing is an important construct in procedural justice theories and tends to be broadly defined as the position that people have in social groups. It is argued that the standing construct suffers from conceptual ambiguity: In procedural justice literature two distinct interpretations of standing can be distinguished, one defining standing as intragroup status and one defining standing as the extent to which people are included in social groups. Furthermore, it is argued that research findings on the relation between standing and procedural justice are not conclusive. The authors review recent empirical findings that address these concerns, and conceptually integrate these findings. In closing, the authors outline avenues for future research that the procedural justice field may want to take, and discuss implications of the work reviewed here.
AB - : In the current chapter, the authors explore the relation between social standing and procedural justice. Standing is an important construct in procedural justice theories and tends to be broadly defined as the position that people have in social groups. It is argued that the standing construct suffers from conceptual ambiguity: In procedural justice literature two distinct interpretations of standing can be distinguished, one defining standing as intragroup status and one defining standing as the extent to which people are included in social groups. Furthermore, it is argued that research findings on the relation between standing and procedural justice are not conclusive. The authors review recent empirical findings that address these concerns, and conceptually integrate these findings. In closing, the authors outline avenues for future research that the procedural justice field may want to take, and discuss implications of the work reviewed here.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144456304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27144456304&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10463280340000108
DO - 10.1080/10463280340000108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:27144456304
SN - 1046-3283
VL - 15
SP - 33
EP - 58
JO - European Review of Social Psychology
JF - European Review of Social Psychology
IS - 1
ER -