Abstract
Polar ecosystems are threatened by non-native plants, and this risk will increase with climate warming. Non-native plant growth depends on Antarctic environmental conditions and substrates, but these influences are poorly quantified. Under laboratory conditions we quantified the growth of Holcus lanatus, Trifolium repens and Taraxacum officinale across nine sub-Antarctic and Maritime Antarctic substrates with varying characteristics. This included, among others, variation in carbon (0.2–27.0%), nitrogen (0.03–2.1%) and phosphorus (0.04–0.54%) contents, under simulated Antarctic conditions (2°C) and a warming scenario. Legacy effects from an established non-native chironomid midge (Eretmoptera murphyi) and non-native grasses were included. H. lanatus and T. repens grew best in organic- and nutrient-rich substrates, while T. officinale growth was poorly correlated with substrate characteristics. Warming increased plant size by one to three times, but inconsistently across species and substrates, suggesting that climate change impacts on plant growth will vary across the Maritime Antarctic. A variable response was also observed in the legacy effects of E. murphyi, while non-native grasses increased H. lanatus and T. repens plant size, but not that of T. officinale. Plant growth was positively correlated with substrate organic and phosphorus content, and this information was used to trial a novel approach to identifying sites ‘at risk’ from plant invasions in the Maritime Antarctic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 87-99 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Antarctic Science |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 24 Feb 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), 2025.
Funding
The study is a contribution to the Integrated Science to Inform Antarctic and Southern Ocean Conservation (Ant-ICON) Scientific Research Programme of the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR). We thank two anonymous reviewers and the editor for helpful comments. This study was logistically supported by the British Antarctic Survey and funded by the Netherlands Polar Programme (ALWPP2016.006). PC is supported by core funding from the Natural Environment Research Council to the British Antarctic Survey’s ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ team. This study was logistically supported by the British Antarctic Survey and funded by the Netherlands Polar Programme (ALWPP2016.006). PC is supported by core funding from the Natural Environment Research Council to the British Antarctic Survey’s ‘Biodiversity, Evolution and Adaptation’ team.
Keywords
- Forb
- grass
- invasion risk
- mapping
- policy decision