Abstract
The present study addresses some of the fundamental issues and challenges of the semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics. Showing that cognitive linguists have contributed to the study of gesture forms and functions in various areas of research, the authors indicate that the questions of whether gestures are signs and whether they make a semiotic system still cause much debate. In line with the previous studies, especially with "Kendon's continuum", the authors show that gestures differ in terms of conventionality, but other semiotic parameters of gestures should be taken into account as well. Relying on a broad understanding of semiosis, the authors argue that gestures should be considered as proper signs and analyzed in terms of a multi-vector model. Unlike language signs, gestures are characterized by highly variable semiotic profiles that are shaped in multimodal usage events, and they form a fluid system with unique qualities.
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 25-36 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki |
| Volume | 2018 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Gesture
- Kendon's continuum
- Semiotic profile of a gesture
- Semiotic system
- Usage event
Cite this
}
The semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics : Contribution and challenges. / Iriskhanova, O. K.; Cienki, A.
In: Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, Vol. 2018, No. 4, 10.2018, p. 25-36.Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - The semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics
T2 - Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
AU - Iriskhanova, O. K.
AU - Cienki, A.
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - The present study addresses some of the fundamental issues and challenges of the semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics. Showing that cognitive linguists have contributed to the study of gesture forms and functions in various areas of research, the authors indicate that the questions of whether gestures are signs and whether they make a semiotic system still cause much debate. In line with the previous studies, especially with "Kendon's continuum", the authors show that gestures differ in terms of conventionality, but other semiotic parameters of gestures should be taken into account as well. Relying on a broad understanding of semiosis, the authors argue that gestures should be considered as proper signs and analyzed in terms of a multi-vector model. Unlike language signs, gestures are characterized by highly variable semiotic profiles that are shaped in multimodal usage events, and they form a fluid system with unique qualities.
AB - The present study addresses some of the fundamental issues and challenges of the semiotics of gestures in cognitive linguistics. Showing that cognitive linguists have contributed to the study of gesture forms and functions in various areas of research, the authors indicate that the questions of whether gestures are signs and whether they make a semiotic system still cause much debate. In line with the previous studies, especially with "Kendon's continuum", the authors show that gestures differ in terms of conventionality, but other semiotic parameters of gestures should be taken into account as well. Relying on a broad understanding of semiosis, the authors argue that gestures should be considered as proper signs and analyzed in terms of a multi-vector model. Unlike language signs, gestures are characterized by highly variable semiotic profiles that are shaped in multimodal usage events, and they form a fluid system with unique qualities.
KW - Gesture
KW - Kendon's continuum
KW - Semiotic profile of a gesture
KW - Semiotic system
KW - Usage event
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055591773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055591773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-25-36
DO - 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-4-25-36
M3 - Article
VL - 2018
SP - 25
EP - 36
JO - Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
JF - Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki
SN - 1812-3228
IS - 4
ER -