TY - JOUR
T1 - The signature of human pressure history on the biogeography of body mass in tetrapods
AU - Rapacciuolo, Giovanni
AU - Marin, Julie
AU - Costa, Gabriel C.
AU - Helmus, Matthew R.
AU - Behm, Jocelyn E.
AU - Brooks, Thomas M.
AU - Hedges, S. Blair
AU - Radeloff, Volker C.
AU - Young, Bruce E.
AU - Graham, Catherine H.
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Aim: Examining the biogeography of body size is crucial for understanding how animal communities are assembled and maintained. In tetrapods, body size varies predictably with temperature, moisture, productivity seasonality and topographical complexity. Although millennial-scale human pressures are known to have led to the extinction of primarily large-bodied tetrapods, human pressure history is often ignored in studies of body size that focus on extant species. Here, we analyse 11,377 tetrapod species of the Western Hemisphere to test whether millennial-scale human pressures have left an imprint on contemporary body mass distributions throughout the tetrapod clade. Location: Western Hemisphere. Time period: Contemporary. Major taxa studied: Tetrapods (birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles). Methods: We mapped the distribution of assemblage-level median tetrapod body mass at a resolution of 110 km across the Western Hemisphere. We then generated multivariate models of median body mass as a function of temperature, moisture, productivity seasonality and topographical complexity, as well as two variables capturing the history of human population density and human-induced land conversion over the past 12,000 years. We controlled for both spatial and phylogenetic autocorrelation effects on body mass–environment relationships. Results: Human pressures explain a small but significant portion of geographical variation in median body mass that cannot be explained by ecological constraints alone. Overall, the median body mass of tetrapod assemblages is lower than expected in areas with a longer history of high human population density and land conversion, but there are important differences among tetrapod classes. Main conclusions: At this broad scale, the effect of human pressure history on tetrapod body mass is low relative to that of ecology. However, ignoring spatial variation in the history of human pressure is likely to lead to bias in studies of the present-day functional composition of tetrapod assemblages, at least in areas that have long been influenced by humans.
AB - Aim: Examining the biogeography of body size is crucial for understanding how animal communities are assembled and maintained. In tetrapods, body size varies predictably with temperature, moisture, productivity seasonality and topographical complexity. Although millennial-scale human pressures are known to have led to the extinction of primarily large-bodied tetrapods, human pressure history is often ignored in studies of body size that focus on extant species. Here, we analyse 11,377 tetrapod species of the Western Hemisphere to test whether millennial-scale human pressures have left an imprint on contemporary body mass distributions throughout the tetrapod clade. Location: Western Hemisphere. Time period: Contemporary. Major taxa studied: Tetrapods (birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles). Methods: We mapped the distribution of assemblage-level median tetrapod body mass at a resolution of 110 km across the Western Hemisphere. We then generated multivariate models of median body mass as a function of temperature, moisture, productivity seasonality and topographical complexity, as well as two variables capturing the history of human population density and human-induced land conversion over the past 12,000 years. We controlled for both spatial and phylogenetic autocorrelation effects on body mass–environment relationships. Results: Human pressures explain a small but significant portion of geographical variation in median body mass that cannot be explained by ecological constraints alone. Overall, the median body mass of tetrapod assemblages is lower than expected in areas with a longer history of high human population density and land conversion, but there are important differences among tetrapod classes. Main conclusions: At this broad scale, the effect of human pressure history on tetrapod body mass is low relative to that of ecology. However, ignoring spatial variation in the history of human pressure is likely to lead to bias in studies of the present-day functional composition of tetrapod assemblages, at least in areas that have long been influenced by humans.
KW - Americas
KW - amphibians
KW - body size
KW - functional diversity
KW - human pressure
KW - reptiles
KW - terrestrial vertebrates
KW - western hemisphere
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021719700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021719700&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/geb.12612
DO - 10.1111/geb.12612
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85021719700
SN - 1466-822X
VL - 26
SP - 1022
EP - 1034
JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography
JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography
IS - 9
ER -