The structure of the climate debate

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

First-best climate policy is a uniform carbon tax which gradually rises over time. Civil servants have complicated climate policy to expand bureaucracies, politicians to create rents. Environmentalists have exaggerated climate change to gain influence, other activists have joined the climate bandwagon. Opponents to climate policy have attacked the weaknesses in climate research. The climate debate is convoluted and polarized as a result, and climate policy complex. Climate policy should become easier and more rational as the Paris Agreement has shifted climate policy back towards national governments. Changing political priorities, austerity, and a maturing bureaucracy should lead to a more constructive climate debate.

LanguageEnglish
Pages431-438
Number of pages8
JournalEnergy Policy
Volume104
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Taxation
Climate change
environmental policy
Carbon
climate
bureaucracy
pollution tax
climate change

Keywords

  • Climate policy
  • Political economy

Cite this

@article{0c793f844a0848e2bde95684a0f96ebe,
title = "The structure of the climate debate",
abstract = "First-best climate policy is a uniform carbon tax which gradually rises over time. Civil servants have complicated climate policy to expand bureaucracies, politicians to create rents. Environmentalists have exaggerated climate change to gain influence, other activists have joined the climate bandwagon. Opponents to climate policy have attacked the weaknesses in climate research. The climate debate is convoluted and polarized as a result, and climate policy complex. Climate policy should become easier and more rational as the Paris Agreement has shifted climate policy back towards national governments. Changing political priorities, austerity, and a maturing bureaucracy should lead to a more constructive climate debate.",
keywords = "Climate policy, Political economy",
author = "Tol, {Richard S.J.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "431--438",
journal = "Energy Policy",
issn = "0301-4215",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

The structure of the climate debate. / Tol, Richard S.J.

In: Energy Policy, Vol. 104, 2017, p. 431-438.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The structure of the climate debate

AU - Tol, Richard S.J.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - First-best climate policy is a uniform carbon tax which gradually rises over time. Civil servants have complicated climate policy to expand bureaucracies, politicians to create rents. Environmentalists have exaggerated climate change to gain influence, other activists have joined the climate bandwagon. Opponents to climate policy have attacked the weaknesses in climate research. The climate debate is convoluted and polarized as a result, and climate policy complex. Climate policy should become easier and more rational as the Paris Agreement has shifted climate policy back towards national governments. Changing political priorities, austerity, and a maturing bureaucracy should lead to a more constructive climate debate.

AB - First-best climate policy is a uniform carbon tax which gradually rises over time. Civil servants have complicated climate policy to expand bureaucracies, politicians to create rents. Environmentalists have exaggerated climate change to gain influence, other activists have joined the climate bandwagon. Opponents to climate policy have attacked the weaknesses in climate research. The climate debate is convoluted and polarized as a result, and climate policy complex. Climate policy should become easier and more rational as the Paris Agreement has shifted climate policy back towards national governments. Changing political priorities, austerity, and a maturing bureaucracy should lead to a more constructive climate debate.

KW - Climate policy

KW - Political economy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009461452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009461452&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005

DO - 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.005

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 431

EP - 438

JO - Energy Policy

T2 - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

SN - 0301-4215

ER -