The Too- Much-Talent Effect: Team interdependence determines when more talent is too much versus not enough.

R.I. Swaab, M. Schaerer, E.M Anicich, R.D. Ronay, A.D. Galinsky

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Five studies examined the relationship between talent and team performance. Two survey studies found that people believe there is a linear and nearly monotonic relationship between talent and performance: Participants expected that more talent improves performance and that this relationship never turns negative. However, building off research on status conflicts, we predicted that talent facilitates performance-but only up to a point, after which the benefits of more talent decrease and eventually become detrimental as intrateam coordination suffers. We also predicted that the level of task interdependence is a key determinant of when more talent is detrimental rather than beneficial. Three archival studies revealed that the too-much-talent effect emerged when team members were interdependent (football and basketball) but not independent (baseball). Our basketball analysis also established the mediating role of team coordination. When teams need to come together, more talent can tear them apart. © The Author(s) 2014.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1581-1591
    Number of pages10
    JournalPsychological Science
    Volume25
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Too- Much-Talent Effect: Team interdependence determines when more talent is too much versus not enough.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this