The transparant assessment center: The effects of revealing dimensions to applicant

N.J. Kolk, M.Ph. Born, H. van der Flier

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    71 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    What are the effects of revealing dimensions to candidates in an assessment centre? This question is addressed in two independent studies, using individual exercises. Results in Study 1 showed no difference in construct-related validity between a transparent (N = 99) and a non-transparent group of university students (N = 50), contrary to previous findings by Kleinmann, Kuptsch, and Köller (1996) and Kleinmann (1997), who used group exercises. Also, mean ratings did not alter, the exception being the dimension "Sensitivity", which increased slightly after the transparency treatment. Conversely, results in Study 2, which contained a sample of actual job applicants, showed a significant improvement in construct-related validity for the transparent group (N = 297) compared with the non-transparent group (N = 393). Again, mean ratings did not differ between these two groups. Implications of these findings for practice and suggestions for future research are discussed in this paper.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)648-668
    JournalApplied Psychology
    Volume52
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The transparant assessment center: The effects of revealing dimensions to applicant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this